SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 34362

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MRS. SHAREEFA HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
TAHSILDAR – Respondent


ORDER

Heard learned counsel Sri Haneef M.H. for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the respondent.

2. In this writ petition the petitioner is seeking intervention relating to the initiation of the proceedings in LGC (G) No.242/2018 before the Special Judge, Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition, Bengaluru. Subsequent to initiation of proceedings, cognizance has been taken by the Special Judge in the aforesaid proceedings. This submission is made by counsel for the petitioner in support of the grounds urged in this writ petition.

3. Whereas counsel for the petitioner has facilitated copy of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Karnataka Act No.30 of 2022)

wherein Amendment of Section 2 reads as under:

In Section 2 of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 398 of 2014), in clause(d), for sub-clause(i), the following shall be substituted, namely:

“(i) Land falling in all urban areas of the State and also land falling within 18 kms from the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike limits, land falling within 10 kms from the city limits notified under the provisions of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, land falling within 5 kms from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top