SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI K SHANKARLAL – Appellant
Versus
THE POSTMASTER HSG I – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question direction issued by the 1st respondent dated 23-09-2021 holding that the petitioner would not be entitled to any interest on the deposit made by him in the Public Provident Fund Scheme.

2. Heard Sri Chandrashekar Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri H.Shanthi Bhushan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for the respondents.

3. Facts adumbrated are as follows:-

The petitioner desirous of opening an account in the name of Hindu Undivided Family (‘HUF’ for short) in the Public Provident Fund Scheme (‘the Scheme’ for short) opened an account through an agent of the Provident Fund Organization who deals with such matters. The account was opened on 03.09.2009 and the maturity date of the said account is on 31.03.2025. The petitioner without fail has made deposits into the account which is now worth at `12,96,412/- inclusive of interest applicable under the said Scheme. After about 12 years of opening of the account on 23-09-2021, the 1st respondent/ Postmaster HSG-I, India Post communicates to the petitioner observing that the petitioner has opened a PPF account under the Scheme in the capaci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top