- 1 -
MFA No. 25042 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT
MISC. FIRST APPEAL NO. 25042 OF 2010 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SUDHA KRISHNA MANDOLKAR
AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURER/O: H.NO. 824,
MENSE GALLIBELGAUM. NOW R/O KANGRAL
GALLIBELGAUM.
…APPELLANT
(BY
SRI.
AVINASH
MALIPATIL,
ADV.
FOR SHRIHARSH
A
NEELOPANT, ADV.)
AND:
1.
NARAYAN RAVINDRA BADIGER
R/O. C/O S.B. DHONDWADKAR2323/B, HATTIHOLE
GALLIBELGAUM. (OWNER OF TATA INDICA CAR
BEARING NO. MH-02/MA-4022)
2.
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LTD., THROUGH ITS MANAGING
DIRECTORORIENTAL HOUSE, CLUB ROAD,BELGAUM.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.N. RAICHUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)(R1-SERVED)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MV
AC PRAYING TO SE-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
18.6.2010 IN MVC NO.772/2009 PASSED BY THE COURT OF FTC-
II
AND
ADDL
MACT,
BELGAUM
AND
TO
ENHANCE
THE
COMPENSATION ALREADY GRANTED TO THE APPELLANT IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.
Digitally signed
by JAGADISH T
R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD
Date:
2022.06.24
10:23:43
+0530
- 2 -
MFA No. 25042 of 2010
This appeal is at the instance of the claimant seeking
enhancement of compensation awarded under judgment
and award dated 18.06.2010 in MVC No.772/2009 by the
learned FTC-II and Addl. MACT, Belgaum (for short,
‘Tribunal’). By the said judgment and award, the learned
Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.1,24,640/-
with interest thereon at 6% per annum from the date of
petition till date of payment.
2.
Brief facts insofar as the same are necessary for
the purpose of adjudicating the present appeal are that on
6.2.2009 at about 6.45 p.m., when the claimant/appellant
was walking by the side of road, offending Tata Indica Car
bearing registration No.MH-02/MA-4022 being driven by
it’s driver in a rash and negligent manner and in high
speed dashed against her resulting in grievous injuries to
her.
3.
Before the learned Tribunal, owner of the
offending car remained exparte and the Insurance
- 3 -
Company resisted the claim petition by filing it’s written
statement.
4.
During trial, the claimant examined herself as
PW1 and she examined a Medical Expert as PW2 and
Exs.P1 to P13 were marked. Respondent-Insurance
Company did not examine any witness; but Ex.R1-policy of
insurance was marked.
5.
The only contention advanced by the learned
counsel
for
the
appellant/claimant
is
regarding
insufficiency
of
the
compensation
awarded
and
in
particular, quantum of compensation assessed by the
learned Tribunal under the head of loss of earning
capacity. Learned counsel drew my attention to the
elaborate medical records produced, inter-alia, Ex.P5-
Wound Certificate, Ex.P9-Discharge Summary and Ex.P12-
Disability Certificate and the oral evidence of PW1 and
PW2. He, therefore, submitted that the compensation
awarded by the learned Tribunal is liable to be enhanced.
- 4 -
6.
Learned counsel for the Insurance Company,
per contra, contended that the learned Tribunal having
appreciated the entire evidence placed before it has
awarded just and reasonable compensation and therefore,
there is no merit in this appeal and the same is liable to be
dismissed.
7.
I have given my careful consideration to the
submissions made on both sides and perused the records.
8.
In regard to the nature of injuries suffered by
the claimant, Ex.P5-Wound Certificate, Ex.P9-Discharge
Summary and Ex.P12-Disability Certificate are relevant to
be considered. Ex.P5-Wound Certificate reads as under:
i)
Bone deep laceration (+) over the medial aspect
of right foot extending upto base of great toe
measuring 8x5 cms
ii)
Comp. comminuted # of lower 1/3rd of tibia (rt
side)
iii) # of 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th metatarsal bone (rt side)
9.
Ex.P9-Discharge Summary reads as under:
DOA:06/02/09
DOD:17/09/09
DOS:07/02/09
CLW over medial aspect of (R) foot over the base great
toe 8x5 cms tip of the #ed bone exposed through the
medial aspect of L/3rd leg.
X-ray :- i) L/3rd comp. commin type 1 # tibia and fibula
- 5 -
ii) # 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th metatarsal bone
DIAGNOSIS:
1) L/3rd comp.c comm. Type 1# tibia and fibula
2) # 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th metatarsal bone.
PROCEDURE:
-
CR interlocking Nailing SA
-
CR K-wiring
ADVICE:
A/k slab for (10) days followed by A/K cast for (40)
days.
Non wt bearing for 3 months.
10. The above clearly shows that the claimant had
suffered compound comminuted fracture of lower 1/3rd of
right tibia and there were fractures of 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th
metatarsal bone of right foot. PW2-doctor had stated that
there was bone deep laceration over medial aspect of right
foot extended to the base great toe measuring 8x5 cms.
The above details furnished in Ex.P5-Wound Certificate
shows that the claimant had suffered a very serious
fracture of right lower leg which is weight bearing limb of
the body. This is further supported by an entry in the
Discharge Summary issued by the hospital where claimant
had taken treatment. PW2-doctor examined before the
- 6 -
learned Tribunal was the one who treated the claimant in
the hospital where she had undergone treatment. In his
eviden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.