SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37467

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN

W.P.H.C. NO.3 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. K.S. NATARAJ

S/O K.N. SREEKANTAIAH

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

R/AT NO.84, "SRINIKETHANA"

1ST MAIN ROAD, VITTAL NAGAR

NEAR ISRO LAYOUT

BENGALURU 560 111.

2. SHRI. K.S. SURESH

S/O K.N. SREEKANTAIAH

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

R/AT NO.317, NANDI SHELTER

'C' BLOCK

JAYANGARA HOUSING BOARD SOCEITY

TURAHALLY, BENGALURU 560 061

.... PETITIONERS

(BY MR. MURALIDHAR S.R. ADV.,)

AND:

1.

B.K. VALLABHA

S/O LATE B. KRISHNAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

R/AT NO.638, SRI HARI

7TH MAIN ROAD

ISRO LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560 111.

2.

B.K. LAKSHMIKANTHA

S/O LATE B. KRISHNAMURTHY

2

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

R/AT NO.55, OPP. GOVT SCHOOL

VAISHNAVA DEVI FARM

CHUNCHANAGUPPA POST

RAMOHALLI

TAVAREKERE HOBLI

RAMANGARA DIST

KARNATAKA.

3.

B.K. SATHYANARAYANA

S/O LATE B. KRISHNAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS

R/AT NO. C/O 638, SRI HARI

7TH MAIN ROAD

ISRO LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560 111.

4.

B.K. RAJAGOPALA

S/O LATE B. KRISHNAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

R/AT NO. C/O 638 SRI HARI

7TH MAIN ROAD, ISRO LAYOUT

BENGALURU 560 111.

5.

THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

BENGALURU 560 001.

6.

THE DIRECTOR

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH

AND NEURO SCIENCES

HOSUR ROAD

NEAR BANGALORE MILK DIARY

HOMBEGOWDA NAGAR

BENGALURU 560 029.

7.

THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

ASKARI ALI ROAD

BENGALURU 560 001.

8.

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

SUBRAMANYAPURA POLICE STATION

SUBRAMANYAPURA

3

BENGALURU 560 070.

9.

SRI. C.R. SRINIVAS

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

SUBRAMANYAPURA POLICE STATION

SUBRAMANYAPURA

BENGALURU 560 070.

10. STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF HOME

VIDHANA SOUDHA

BENGALURU - 560001.

... RESPONDENTS

(BY MR. THEJESH P, HCGP)

- - -

THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO PASS AN APPROPRIATE

ORDER. DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.7 TO 9 TO RELEASE

THE VICTIM INSANE PERSONS SHRI. NAGENDRA B.V. AND SMT.

SANDHYA NAGASHRI B.V. FROM THE ILLEGAL CUSTODY OF THE

RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 4 TO PRODUCE THEM BEFORE THIS

HON'BLE COURT. DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.5 TO TAKE

THE

CUSTODY

OF

THE

VICTIM

INSANE

PERSONS

SHRI.

NAGENDRA B.V. AND SMT. SANDHYA NAGASHRI B.V. AND HAND

OVER THEM TO THE RESPONDENT NO.6 FOR THE TREATMENT OF

THEIR MENTAL ILLNESS.

THIS WPHC COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,

ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:

4

Mr.Thejesh P., learned High Court Government Pleader

for the State respondents.

This petition has been filed seeking a writ of Habeas

Corpus for production of Smt.Sandhya Nagashree B.V. and

Sri.Nagendra B.V.

2. When the matter was taken up today, learned High

Court Government Pleader has produced Smt.Sandhya

Nagashree B.V. and Sri.Nagendra B.V. Admittedly, both the

aforesaid persons suffer from mental infirmity. Respondent

No.2

namely

B.K.Lakshmikantha

who

is

related

to

Smt.Sandhya Nagashree B.V. and Sri.Nagendra B.V. as

uncle, is also present.

3. It is stated by him that Smt.Sandhya Nagashree

B.V. and Sri.Nagendra B.V. were residing with their mother

Smt.Mythreyi who expired on 13.11.2021. It is also stated

that the aforesaid persons were unable to take care of

themselves as they are mentally infirm. Therefore, the

respondent No.2 who is their uncle has brought them to his

5

home and presently they are residing in his house and are

being treated for the illness suffered by them.

4. When a query was put to the learned counsel for the

petitioners whether the petitioners are ready and willing to

take care of the aforesaid persons, learned counsel for the

petitioners stated that the petitioners are not ready and

willing to take care of aforesaid persons.

5. From the aforementioned facts, it is evident that

Smt.Sandhya Nagashree B.V. and Sri.Nagendra B.V. are not

under detention or illegal custody of respondent No.2.

Therefore, we do not find any ground to entertain the writ

petition. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to

take action in accordance with law in respect of their

grievance, if any.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

RV

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top