SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 60518

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
M/S KAR CARE – Appellant
Versus
M/S 3M INDIA LIMITED – Respondent


1.

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the

following reliefs:

<To appoint a sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes

and outstanding issues between the parties in

accordance with the provisions of the Franchise

Agreement dated 06.12.2018 and in accordance

with Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in the

interest of justice=.

2.

The petitioner claims that the petitioner had entered

into an agreement dated 06.12.2018 with the

respondent, which is governed by an arbitration

clause in terms of Article 32 thereof, which is

reproduced hereunder for easy reference:

Article 32

APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES

1. This agreement and the rights and obligations of the

Parties

hereunder

shall

be

construed

and

interpreted in accordance with Indian substantive

and procedural laws, applicable to Agreements

made and to be performed entirely therein. Subject

to Article 32(2), the courts at Bengaluru shall have

the jurisdiction over disputes and differences arising

out of this Agreement.

2. The Parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve

any dispute, difference or claim arising out of or in

r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top