B L NAGENDRA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The petitioner, common in all these petitions, has
knocked the doors of this Court calling in question
proceedings instituted in crime No.51/2022 for the
offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the
IPC, which is impugned in Crl.P.No.3647/2022; crime
No.1/2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 406,
420,
506
and
120B
of
the
IPC
impugned
in
Crl.P.No.2742/2022; crime No.50/2022 for the offences
punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC
impugned in Crl.P.No.3650/2022 and crime No.52/2022
for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of
the IPC impugned in Crl.P.No.3657/2022, all pending
before the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,
Bengaluru City.
2. The complainants differ in all these cases but the
petitioner - accused remains the same and he is the sole
- 8 -
accused in all these cases. Therefore, the cases are taken
up together and considered by this common order.
3. Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the
petitions as borne out from the common pleadings are as
follows:
The petitioner and the respective complainants in all
these cases enter into agreements of sale with regard to
different properties, by way of separate agre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.