2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40247
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR.JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101731 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. N. CHANNABASAVANA GOUDA,
S/O. DODDANAGOUDA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. ULURU VILLAGE, TQ. SIRUGUPPA,
DIST. BALLARI.
& PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. T. M. NADAF, ADV.)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
SIRIGERI POLICE STATION,
BY S.P.P.,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENCH AT DHARWAD.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF
CR.P.C. SEEKING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5 ON
2
REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO.40/2022 OF SRIGERI POLICE STATION, FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 307, 120(B) READ WITH
34 OF IPC, ON ACCEPTING SUBSTANTIAL SURETY OR SURETIES.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT
MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.5 under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking for grant of regular bail in Crime
No.40/2022 registered by Sirigeri Police Station, Tekkalakote Circle,
District Ballari for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and
120(B) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short
8IPC9).
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that on the complaint of
one Basappa before the Police on 21.03.2022 alleging that on the
said day when he was proceeding on his motorcycle, some three
persons were stopped his motorcycle and they stated to lend some
petrol as the petrol is exhausted in their motorcycle and hence the
3
complainant stopped his vehicle, at that time someone thrown chilly
powder on his face and trying to kill him. The complainant by
calling others trying to catch them, but two persons were escaped
from the spot and they caught hold only one person who is juvenile
offender by name Mahesh Babu S/o. Mallikarjuna, aged about 16
years. On enquiry he has revealed the names of Narendra and Ravi
those who were escaped from the spot. After arresting the juvenile
offender, the Police also arrested accused No.3, while in
investigation it was revealed the name of accused No.4 who said to
be engaged accused Nos.1 to 3 to commit the murder of the
complainant. Therefore the Police arrested the accused No.4,
where he has pointed out accused No.5 at whose instance they
have
committed
attempt
to
murder
of
the
complainant.
Subsequently, accused No.5 arrested on 16.05.2022 and remanded
to judicial custody. The bail petition filed by the petitioner came to
be rejected. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court seeking for
grant of bail.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended
that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offences. There is no
4
injury caused to the complainant. The accused Nos.1 to 3 was
attempt to commit murder of the complainant, even though they
have not assaulted by themselves. There is no motive or intention
shown in the complaint except harassing the complainant, nothing
has been recovered. The petitioner is in custody from one month
and he is ready to abide by any conditions. All the accused persons
were arrested. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail.
5.
Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader
has seriously objected the bail petition and contended that the
petitioner is also indulge in supari killer who attempt to committing
murder of the complainant, but he was escaped from the spot. The
investigation is still in progress, therefore she prayed for rejection
of bail petition.
6.
Upon hearing the arguments of both counsel and
perused the records.
7.
Of course, there is no injury sustained by the accused
persons except throwing chilly powder on the face of the
complainant. This first accused is said to be juvenile offender aged
about 16 years was apprehended the juvenile police and on his
5
statement accused No.2 was arrested. In turn, accused No.2 given
statement that this petitioner engaged accused No.4 by giving
supari to commit murder of the complainant. However detailed
investigation is not available on record except complaint and FIR
never these petitioner not found in FIR, complaint and not motive
or anything mentioned in the complaint to show this petitioner was
participated in the crime. However, even for the purpose of Section
120(B) of IPC, there is no material placed on record.
8.
Considering the case, I am of the that view that most of
the investigation has been completed except for filing the charge
sheet. Therefore by imposing some stringent conditions if bail is
granted, not prejudice would be caused to the case of the
prosecution. Accordingly, I pass the following order:
9.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. The Trial
Court is directed to release the petitioner/accused No.5 on ba