1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7957/2021
CONNECTED WITH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8796/2021
IN CRL.P.NO.7957/2021
BETWEEN:
1. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O CHALUVEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
2. SHIVAKUMAR P
S/O PRAMESHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT 5TH CROSS
SUBHASH NAGARA, VIDYA NAGARA
SHIVAMOGGA 577201
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI K V SATEESHCHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY RURAL POLICE STATION
SHIVAMOGGA-577201
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING
BANGALORE 560 001
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI R.D.RENUKARADHYA, HCGP)
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN
S.C.NO.80/2021 (CR.NO.415/2020) OF SHIMOGA RURAL P.S.,
SHIVAMOOGA DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147,
148, 149, 120B, 302 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE III
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT SHIVAMOGGA
AND ETC.
IN CRL.P.NO.8796/2021
BETWEEN:
KARAN R, S/O RAVI
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
R/O 5TH CROSS, SUBHASH NAGARA
VIDYA NAGARA
SHIVAMOGGA-577 201
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI K V SATEESHCHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY RURAL POLICE STATION
SHIVAMOGGA -577 201
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI R.D.RENUKARADHYA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
CR.NO.415/2020 OF SHIVAMOGGA RURAL P.S., SHIVAMOGGA
DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 120B, 302
R/W 149 OF IPC, ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA AND ETC.
THESE CRIMINAL PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
These petitions are filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
seeking regular bail of the respective petitioners in Crime
No.415/2020 of Shivamogga Rural Police Station, Shivamogga
for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 120B,
302 read with Section 149 of IPC.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the
respondent-State.
3.
The factual matrix of the cases are that there was a
love affair between the deceased and sister of accused No.1 and
when the deceased refused to marry the sister of accused No.1,
accused No.1 was having motive against the deceased and with
the help of other accused persons, he committed the murder of
the deceased inflicting injury with the knife and machete. Based
on the complaint, the police have registered the case and after
completion of the investigation, filed the charge-sheet for the
aforesaid offences.
4
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit
that the case is rest upon the circumstantial evidence and
though there is a specific overt act allegation against these
petitioners, there are no eye-witnesses to the alleged incident
and the prosecution is relied upon only on the last seen witness
who has not having acquaintance with these petitioners and the
prosecution has not collected any materials against these
petitioners to substantiate that they have involved in the alleged
act and only the joint recovery was made at the instance of
these petitioners and these petitioners are ready to abide by the
conditions that may be imposed by this Court and prayed to
enlarge the petitioners on bail.
5.
Per contra, the learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for the State would submit that these
petitioners also inflicted injury with the knife as well as machete
to the deceased and as a result, he sustained 17 injuries on his
body and cause of death is also on account of multiple injuries
sustained by the deceased and further submits that deceased
motorcycle also recovered at the instance of accused No.1 and
5
hence, there is a prima facie material against these petitioners
and prayed to dismiss the petitions.
6.
Having heard the respective counsel appearing for
the parties and also on perusal of the material on record it is
clear that the case is rest upon the circumstantial evidence and
there is no direct evidence against these petitioners and the
prosecution has not seized any blood stained clothes of these
petitioners to show that they have committed the alleged act but
the prosecution has relied upon only on the last seen witness
who was not having any acquaintance with these petitioners and
also the material discloses that the knife which was used for the
alleged act was thrown at the spot itself and the same was
recovered after the apprehension of these petitioners and test
identification parade was also not conducted by the police and
when there is no prima facie material against these petitioners
and when there is no sound circumstances against these
petitioners, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case to exercise the
discretion in favour of these petitioners as investigation of the
case is completed and charge-sheet has been filed and there is
no need of further custodial trial of these petitioners.
6
7.
In view of the discussions made above, I pass the
following:
ORDER
The
petitions
are
allowed.
Consequently,
the
petitioners/accused Nos.2, 4, 5 shall be released on bail in
connection with Crime No. 415/2020 of Shivamogga Rural Police
Station, Shivamogga for the offences punishable under Sections
143, 147, 148, 120B, 302 read with Section 149 of IPC, subject
to the following conditions:
(i)
The petitioners shall execute their personal
bonds for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two
Lakhs only) each with two sureties each for the
like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional
Court.
(ii)
The petitioners shall not indulge in tampering
the prosecution witnesses.
(iii)
The
petitioners
shall
appea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.