2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 61780
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100567 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
YAMANAPPA S/O. RAMANNA KATAGAR
AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. KADEBAGALU ANEGUNDI,
TQ. GANGAVATHI,
DIST. KOPPAL, PIN. 583227.
&APPELLANT
(BY SRI. ANAND BAGEWADI, ADV. FOR
SRI. SHIVANAND MALASHETTI, ADV.)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY GANGAVATHI POLICE,
REPRESENTED BY,
ADDITIONAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH-580007.
2.
SMT. SHIVALINGAMMA GOVINDAPPA
AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. KADEBAGALU, TQ. GANGAVATHI,
DIST. KOPPAL, PIN. 583227.
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1;
R2 SERVED)
- 2 -
CRL.A No. 100567 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 14-A2 OF
SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION
OF ATROCITIES ) ACT IS SEEKING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND
DIRECT RESPONDENT POLICE TO RELEASE THE APPELLANT ON
BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN SPL C.SC/ST NO.
16/2022 (ARISING OUT OF GANGAVATHI RURAL P.S. CRIME
NO. ,115/2022) FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES UNDER
SECTIONS
143,147,447,323,341,354,504,506,114,149
R/W
149 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va), 3(1)
(w) OF THE SC AND ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES )
AMENDMENT ACT 2015 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOPPAL, IN SO FAR
ACCUSED NO. 16 IS CONCERNED.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
This
appeal
is
filed
by
accused
No.16
challenging the order dated 20.07.2022 passed in
Criminal
Miscellaneous
No.625/2022
by
the
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Koppal,
whereunder, the anticipatory bail petition filed by
- 3 -
this appellant/accused No.16 in respect of Crime
No.115/2022 of Gangavathi Rural Police Station
registered
for
the
offences
punishable
under
Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 354, 447, 504,
506 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal
Code (hereinafter referred to as 8IPC9, for brevity),
Section
3(1)(r),
3(1)(s)
and
3(2)(va)
of
the
Scheduled
Castes
and
Scheduled
Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter
referred to as 8SC & ST (POA) Act9, for brevity)
came to be rejected.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant
and learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondent No.1/State. Inspite of service of
notice, respondent No.2 remained absent and
unrepresented.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that, one
Smt.
Shivalingamma
has
filed
the
complaint
- 4 -
stating that land bearing Sy.No.189/*/1 measuring
1 acre 2 guntas is standing in the name of her
husband and they are cultivating it. It is further
stated that on 08.04.2022 at 9.00 a.m. when the
complainant and her husband had been to water
paddy
fields
in
the
aforesaid
land,
the
appellant/accused
No.16
along
with
19
other
accused formed unlawful assembly and obstructed
them to water paddy fields during which the
complainant made a request to not to obstruct
them stating that neither the accused persons
have any authority over the land nor are their
lands adjacent to the complainant9s and that their
paddy would dry up if not watered in time. It is
further stated that accused No.1 abused her and
stated that her land is adjoining main road which
surges the value of land and hence he and his
family members under the leadership of accused
No.20 would expel the complainant from her
- 5 -
possession of the land and for this reason two
false cases have been lodged by virtue of political
influence of accused No.2 and despite of which the
complainant is abstaining herself from discharging
the possessions of the land and further gave life
threat. It is further stated that this appellant
abused the complainant touching her caste and
slapped her to insult her in the public. It is
further stated that the appellant and accused No.1
pulled her saree and rest of the accused persons
have assaulted her and when her husband came to
rescue her, accused No.20 has provoked the rest
of
the
accused
persons
to
assault
the
complainant9s husband, as a result they began
assaulting the complainant9s husband, at that time
the complainant and her husband ran away from
the
spot.
The
said
complaint
came
to
be
registered in Crime No.115/2022 of Gangavathi
Rural Police Station for the aforesaid offences.
- 6 -
The Police after completing the investigation has
filed the charge sheet against accused Nos.1 to 20.
The charge sheet has been filed against the
appellant/accused
No.16
for
the
offences
punishable under Sections 143, 147, 447, 341,
354, 504, 506 read with Section 149 of IPC and
Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w) and 3(2)(va) of
SC and ST (POA) Act. The appellant/accused
No.16 apprehending his arrest has filed Criminal
Miscellaneous No.625/2022 along with accused
Nos.1 to 8, 12 to 15 and 20 seeking anticipatory
bail and the same came to be rejected so far as
this appellant/accused No.16 is concerned by the
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi by
order dated 20.07.2022 and allowed so far as
accused
Nos.1
to
8,
12
to
15
and
20
are
concerned.
The
appellant/accused
No.16
has
challenged the said order in the instant appeal.
- 7 -
4.
Learned counsel for the appellant would
contend that the complaint is politically motivated,
the averments made in the complaint are false. It
is only to harass this appellant the said complaint
has been filed. No injury has been sustained by
this complainant and her husband. The Special
Court without considering all