2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39856
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.459/2022
BETWEEN:
SUKANTH @ KENCHA
S/O JAVAREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
R/AT 3RD CROSS,
BEHIND ANJANEYA TEMPLE
NEAR PATAKI GODOWN,
HEGGANAHALLI
BENGALURU CITY.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI JANARDHANASWAMY B.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
RAJAGOPALA P.S., BENGALURU
NOW REP. BY SPL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU – 560 001.
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI KRISHNA KUMAR K.K, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
CRIME NO.432/2021 OF RAJAGOPALNAGAR POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU
FOR
THE
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE
UNDER
SECTIONS 399, 402 OF IPC AND SECTION 25-1B(B)(4) OF ARMS
ACT AND ETC.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE
THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking
regular bail of the petitioner in Crime No.432/2021 of
Rajagopalnagar Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences
punishable under Sections 399, 402 of IPC and Section 25-
1B(b)(4) of Arms Act.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the
respondent-State.
3.
The factual matrix of the case is that on 18.11.2021,
the police have received the credible information that some
unknown persons are making preparation to commit dacoity
having deadly weapon like long, iron machete, wooden stick and
chilly powder. Based on the said information, the police visited
the spot and apprehended this petitioner along with other
accused persons and registered the case for the aforesaid
offences and the matter is under investigation.
3
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that there are no any criminal antecedents against
this petitioner and this petitioner is in custody from 18.11.2021
though there is an allegation against this petitioner that this
petitioner along with other accused persons were making
preparation to commit dacoity armed with deadly weapons, no
such activity was committed and hence, he may be enlarged on
bail.
5.
The
learned
High
Court
Government
Pleader
appearing for the respondent-State would submit that even
though there is no criminal antecedents against this petitioner
but he was possessed with deadly weapons and this petitioner
along with other accused persons were making preparation to
commit dacoity and prayed to dismiss the petition.
6.
Having heard the respective counsel and also on
perusal of the material on record, it is clear that the petitioner
was apprehended on 18.11.2021 and one long was recovered at
the instance of this petitioner but the said weapon was not used
to commit the alleged offence and the only allegation against
this petitioner that this petitioner along with other accused
4
persons were making preparation to commit dacoity. Hence, it
is a fit case to exercise the discretion in favour of the petitioner.
7.
In view of the discussions made above, I pass the
following:
ORDER
The
petition
is
allowed.
Consequently,
the
petitioner/accused No.1 shall be released on bail in connection
with Crime No.432/2021 of Rajagopalnagar Police Station,
Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402
of IPC and Section 25-1B(b)(4) of Arms Act, subject to the
following conditions:
(i)
The petitioner shall execute his personal bond
for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs
only) with two sureties for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.
(ii)
The petitioner shall not indulge in tampering
the prosecution witnesses.
(iii)
The
petitioner
shall
appear
before
the
jurisdictional Court on all the future hearing
dates, unless exempted by the Court for any
genuine cause.
5
(iv)
The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of
the Trial Court without prior permission of the
Court till the case registered against him is
disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN