2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39367
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.427 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. MICHAEL FLOYD BERTRAND MOSES
S/O. SRI. LATE EBENEZER MOSES,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.10,
HIGHWOODS CLOSE, CATERHAM,
SURREY, ENGLAND - CR3 6AX, U.K.
2.
MRS. AYESHA MOSES
W/O. MICHAEL FLOYD BERTRAND MOSES,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.10,
HIGHWOODS CLOSE, CATERHAM,
SURREY, ENGLAND - CR3 6AX, U.K.
3.
MRS. GAJULA BALASAWASWATI
W/O. LATE APPADU SANYASI GAJULA,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.101,
5C-813, 5TH CROSS, HRBR LAYOUT,
1ST BLOCK, KALYAN NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 043.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. JAYNA KOTHARI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI ROHAN KOTHARI, ADVOCATE)
- 2 -
AND:
NIL
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.H.R.SHOWRI, AGA)
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 102 OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER DATED 17.06.2022 PASSED IN MISC. PETITION
NO.25042/2022 BY COURT OF XXVI ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
MAYO
HALL
UNIT,
BANGALORE (CCH-20) AND ETC.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION,
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
Aggrieved by the order dated 17.06.2022 passed by
the Court of XXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at
Mayo Hall, Bengaluru in Misc No.25042/2022, the present
civil revision petition is filed.
The instant petition pertains to adoption of a girl
by name Sai Gayathri. She was born on 05.03.2004 and
her mother died on 04.12.2005. Her father is an alcoholic
person and his present whereabouts is not known and
abandoned the girl - Sai Gayathri. Hence, she has been
brought up by her paternal grandparents and it is said that
- 3 -
her paternal grandfather died in the year 2017 and she is
being looked after by her paternal grandmother. As the
grandmother is aged about 80 years, not being in a position
to look after the girl any longer requested her elder
daughter to take care of the girl, for which she agreed.
Petitioner No.3 is the grandmother of the girl - Sai Gayathri
and petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are her uncle and aunt.
Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are of Indian origin and are presently
citizens of United Kingdom and are desirous of adopting the
girl - Sai Gayathri. Hence, they initiated necessary
proceedings as contemplated under the law in both India as
well as in the United Kingdom to formally adopt the girl -
Sai Gayathri. When the proceedings were initiated, the girl
was a minor and as per the provisions of the Juvenile
Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for
short 'the Act'), she could have been adopted by petitioner
Nos.1 and 2. After necessary background check, the
Authorities concerned in India i.e., Central Adoption
Resource Authority (CARA) has issued necessary 'No
Objection Certificate' stating that the minor child - Sai
Gayathri can be adopted by petitioner Nos.1 and 2. The said
- 4 -
certificate is dated 02.03.2022 and when the same was
issued, the girl was still a minor. Subsequently, the counter
part of CARA in United Kingdom as per the Hague
Convention
which
is
Inter-country
Adoption
Team,
Department of Education in United Kingdom as on
07.03.2022 i.e., two days after the girl child attained
majority has issued the necessary letter to the petitioner
Nos.1 and 2 permitting them to adopt the girl. Thereafter,
as per the requirements under the Act and the Rules made
thereunder, the petitioners filed Misc.No.25042/2022 on the
file of XXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge,
Mayohall, Bengaluru, seeking necessary order of adoption
from the Court. The trial Court in the impugned order
examined the procedure adopted by the petitioners and has
held
that
they
have
complied
with
all
necessary
requirements to adopt the girl. However, as on the date of
filing the petition, the girl child had attained majority and
was no more a child, dismissed the petition. Aggrieved by
the said order, the instant petition is filed.
- 5 -
It is contended by the petitioners that the
necessary procedures except for obtaining the orders from
the trial Court have been complied and relevant Authority
CARA had given the necessary permission before the girl
child attained majority. Thereafter, the counter part of
CARA in United Kingdom knowing fully well that the girl had
crossed the age '18', taking into consideration the
requirement of the girl child for care and protection, has
approved the adoption. It is submitted that the trial Court
erred in not appreciating the fact that the necessary
permission has been obtained from CARA prior to child
obtaining the age of majority, has erroneously dismissed
the petition.
4.
Admittedly, the procedure for adopting the girl
was commenced before the Authorities concerned much
prior to she attaining the majority. After due enquiry into
the suitability of the child being adopted by a relative
residing abroad, CARA has given the necessary 'No
Objection Certificate' permitting the girl to be adopted by
the petitioner Nos.1 and 2. Even though the girl had
- 6 -
crossed the age of '18', when the counter part of CARA in
United Kingdom issued the Certificate, it did not prevent