1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.18255 OF 2021 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
L. ASHOK
S/O LATE V. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY
AGED 48 YEARS
R/AT WARD NO.9, BAGEPALLI TOWN
KASABA HOBLI,
BAGEPALLI TALUK - 561207
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.RAMESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU -560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU -560001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING,
M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560001
2
4.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING,
NO.21/7/88, 1ST FLOOR,
BEHIND PHARMACY COLLEGE,
T.G. BANK ROAD,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT,
CHIKKABALLAPUR - 561207
5.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT,
CHIKKABALLAPUR - 562101
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT
ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 31.08.2021 ISSUED BY THE 4TH
RESPONDENT
BEARING
NO.£ÀUÁæAiÉÆÃ¸À¤/a§/¨sÀÆ.§/2021-22/472
WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-Z AND ETC.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR JUDGMENT ON 13.06.2022 AND COMING ON FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:-
The petitioner claims to be the owner of the land
bearing Sy.No.30/1 of Yetagadapalli Village, Kasaba Hobli,
Bagepalli Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. The petitioner,
his mother and brother sought conversion of the aforesaid
3
land for non-agricultural residential purposes, which was
granted in terms of an Official Memorandum dated
08.01.1999. Consequent to such conversion, a residential
layout was formed in terms of a layout plan that was
approved by the Panchayath. The petitioner was one of
the applicants for allotment of a retail petroleum outlet
pursuant to a Notification issued by the Indian Oil
Corporation for establishment of a retail outlet at Bagepalli
(between National Highway - 7 junction to KSRTC Bus
Stand). The Indian Oil Corporation had accepted the
application of the petitioner and granted permission in
terms of an order dated 19.08.2019 for establishment of a
petroleum outlet in Sy.No.30/1 of Yetagadapalli village.
Following the above, the Indian Oil Corporation issued a
plan of the structures and facilities to be installed and
provided. The Indian Oil Corporation mandated that the
space utilized for establishment of the outlet should be
converted for commercial purposes. Consequently, the
petitioner submitted an application on 04.09.2019 to the
respondent No.5 - Deputy Commissioner for conversion of
4
15 guntas of land in Sy.No.30/1 for commercial purposes.
The petitioner was directed to obtain necessary 'No
Objection Certificates' from various authorities, which were
furnished. However, the respondent No.5 did not consider
the application, which compelled the petitioner to submit
another application on 02.12.2019. The respondent No.5
did not take any steps even after all the requisite
documents were received. The petitioner got the land
surveyed for fixation of the boundaries of the area to be
utilized for the purpose of the establishment of the
petroleum outlet.
The petitioner claims that in view of Section
95(5) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964,
(henceforth referred to as "KLR Act of 1964" for short), the
application of the petitioner must have been considered
within four months. As no steps were taken to consider the
application of the petitioner, he filed W.P.No.12266/2020,
which was disposed off on 04.11.2020, directing the
respondent No.5 to consider the application within an outer
5
limit of eight weeks. The respondent No.5 issued an
endorsement dated 22.12.2020 holding that the land
bearing Sy.No.30/1 was converted for residential use, out
of which, 15 guntas was sought to be converted for
commercial use. It was stated that the property lay
adjacent to the State Highway and therefore, the land
lying within 40 meters from the center of the road should
be kept vacant and only land measuring 30 meters x 30
meters has to be utilized for commercial purposes. It was
also held that some residential buildings were put up in 3
acres 25 guntas and therefore, the conversion sought for,
by the petitioner for commercial purposes cannot be
granted in view of the report submitted by the respondent
No.4. The petitioner contends that the respondent No.4
had submitted its report on 23.10.2019 pointing out that it
is not appropriate to grant conversion from residential to
commercial use as a residential layout was already formed,
where houses were constructed.
6
The learned counsel for the petitioner contends
that the Executive Engineer of PWD, Chikkaballapur, had
indicated in terms of his letter dated 24.01.2019 that the
permission can be granted for establishing a petrol bunk
subject to the petitioner setting apart 40 meters from the
center of the road as "no construction zone". He further
contended that a circular was issued by the Public Works
Department on 23.01.2014 indicating the area to be
reserved from the center of road for the purposes of
establishment of a petroleum outlet. In response to an
information sought for, by the petitioner's family members,
the concerned officer of the Public
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.