SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRAHLAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Heard Shri S.H.Mittalkod, the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioners and Shri Ramesh Chigari, the learned HCGP

appearing for the respondent State.

2.

The petitioners in all these cases are land losers,

whose lands were acquired for the purpose of particular

projects. The cases at hand do not concern the proceedings of

compensation or its enhancement. The present proceedings

arise out of the order passed by the Court hearing the reference

6

under the Land Acquisition Act, seeking enhancement of

compensation, for the offence punishable under sections 420,

465, 466, 468, 471 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860.

3.

The

genesis

for

the

case

at

hand

is

LAC

No.439/2005, a judgment rendered on 5.2.2011. The reference

Court while considering the cases of the land losers for

enhancement, passes an order directing the CMO to file a

complaint before the jurisdictional police against all the

claimants in these cases for the act of preparation of false

exhibits P.5 to P.8 i.e., the record of rights showing the entire

land, as the land in which sugarcane crop was being grown, by

committing forgery of further exhibits P.12 and P.13 and making

use of these documents in judi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top