HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRAHLAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Heard Shri S.H.Mittalkod, the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioners and Shri Ramesh Chigari, the learned HCGP
appearing for the respondent State.
2.
The petitioners in all these cases are land losers,
whose lands were acquired for the purpose of particular
projects. The cases at hand do not concern the proceedings of
compensation or its enhancement. The present proceedings
arise out of the order passed by the Court hearing the reference
6
under the Land Acquisition Act, seeking enhancement of
compensation, for the offence punishable under sections 420,
465, 466, 468, 471 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal
Code, 1860.
3.
The
genesis
for
the
case
at
hand
is
LAC
No.439/2005, a judgment rendered on 5.2.2011. The reference
Court while considering the cases of the land losers for
enhancement, passes an order directing the CMO to file a
complaint before the jurisdictional police against all the
claimants in these cases for the act of preparation of false
exhibits P.5 to P.8 i.e., the record of rights showing the entire
land, as the land in which sugarcane crop was being grown, by
committing forgery of further exhibits P.12 and P.13 and making
use of these documents in judi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.