The petitioner has challenged the Order dated

13.08.2009 passed by the respondent No.3 by which a

provisional Order dated 24.11.2008 passed by it under

Section 187(9)(a) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act,

1964 (for short, 8the Act of 19649) and the show cause

notice issued under Section 187(9)(b) of the Act of 1964

were unconditionally withdrawn. The petitioner has also

challenged the Order dated 15.06.2015 passed by the

3

respondent No.2 confirming the aforesaid order passed by

the respondent No.3.

2.

The petitioner claims that 8Manipal Industrial

Area9 developed by the Karnataka Small Scale Industrial

Development Corporation (henceforth referred to as

8KSSIDC9) was transferred to the respondent No.3 for

maintenance and regulation. The respondent No.4 sought

for grant of a licence to construct an industrial shed in

industrial plot No.18 on 16.06.2008. The respondent No.3

granted the licence on 16.10.2008 which was valid for a

period of one year. The petitioner alleged that the grant of

licence was against the building bye-laws. The petitioner,

therefore, sought information vide representation dated

16.10.2018 from the respondent No.3 regarding the road

standards to be followe