2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 45464
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
JAGANMAYI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MR SUMANTH REDDY – Respondent
CMP 449/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
CMP NO.449/2022
BETWEEN :
1.
JAGANMAYI BUILDERS AND
DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A COMPANY INCORPORATED
UNDER THE PROVISION OF
COMPANIES ACT, 2013
HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT
SALARPURIA WINDSOR,
NO.3, 4TH FLOOR, ULSOOR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 042.
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. ASHWIN SANCHETI.
2.
NEELANCHAL HAPPY GRIHA LLP
A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
REGISTERED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS
OF LIMITED LIABILITY
PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
SALARPURIA WINDSOR, NO.3,
4TH FLOOR, ULSOOR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 042.
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. ASHWIN SANCHETI.
2
3.
JAGANMAYI CONSTRUCTIONS
PRIVATE LIMITED
A COMPANY INCORPORATED
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
COMPANIES ACT 2013
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
SALARPURIA WINDSOR,
NO.3, 4TH FLOOR,
ULSOOR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 042.
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. ASHWIN SANCHETI.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.L. VISHWANATH, SENIOR ADVOCATE
FOR SRI. ARUN PRADESH E, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MR SUMANTH REDDY
R/AT NO. S -001, LE PROMENADE
PROMENANDE APARTMENTS,
LE PROMENANDE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN
BENGALURU - 560 005.
AND AT NO. 537, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT,
OPPOSITE TO DELL AND NEXT
TO SHELL PETROL BUNK
DOMLUR, BENGALURU 560 071.
AND AT 24/161,
SHANTI NAGAR
NEAR SINDURA NURSING HOME
DARGAMITTA, NELLORE
ANDHRA PRADESH - 524 003.
2.
MR. SREENADHA REDDY
HAVING HIS OFFICE AT
KAY KAY TOWERS,
3
NO.18, 17th CROSS,
SECTOR 7, HSR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU 560 102.
110 TANJONG, RHU ROAD,
UNIT 10- 02, CAMELOT BY WATER
SINGAPORE 436 928.
3.
RP PLATINA
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
KAY KAY TOWERS
No.18, 17TH CROSS
SECTOR 7, HSR LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 560 102.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.K.V. CHALAPATHY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
FOR SRI. SIDDHARTHA H M &
MANJUNATH B, ADVOCATES)
THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE
ARBITRATION & CONCILATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO
APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR IN TERMS OF CLAUSE-18
R/W 19 OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
DATED
06/10/2018
VIDE
ANNEXURE-A
AND
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT DATED 06/10/2018 VIDE
ANNEXURE-C
TO
ADJUDICATE
THE
DISPUTE
IN
QUESTION BETWEEN THE PARTIES.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT
OF
ORDERS
THIS
DAY,
THIS
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
4
O R D E R
The
petitioners have filed this
petition
for
appointment of a sole arbitrator relying upon the terms
of Memorandum of Understanding dated 06.10.2018
[MOU]
and
the
Supplemental
Agreement
dated
04.12.2018 [Supplemental Agreement]. The respondents,
who are together parties to both the MOU and the
Supplemental Agreement unlike the petitioners, resist
the petition essentially contending that there is no
subsisting agreement for arbitration. The MOU is only
between the first petitioner and the respondents, but all
the petitioners and respondents are parties to the
Supplemental Agreement.
2.
The first petitioner, M/s Jaganmayi Builders
and Developers Private Limited, and the respondents
have entered into MOU for the construction of a
Commercial Office Complex under a joint venture
arrangement in the land measuring 20 acres in the
5
different
survey
numbers
of
two
villages
viz.,
Kariyammana
Agrahara
and
Devara
Beesanahalli
Villages of Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk [the
subject property] in anticipation of the allotment of this
land by M/s. Karnataka Industrial Areas Development
Board [KIADB] in favour of the respondents. The first
petitioner, in consideration of the assurance to grant
development rights on terms as mentioned in the MOU,
has
agreed
to
pay
security
deposit
of
Rs.135,00,00,000/- [Rs. One Hundred and Thirty Five
Crores Only]. The first petitioner, as acknowledged in
the MOU, has paid Rs.25,00,00,000/- [Rs. Twenty Five
Crores Only