SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SRI K VENKATASWAMY GOWDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


Sri.M.Narayana Reddy, learned counsel accepts notice

for respondent No.3.

Petitioner No.1 who was in possession of the

subject property submitted an application to respondent

No.4 to register the khatha in his favour. Respondent No.4

after inviting objections from the public registered the

-3-

khatha in favour of petitioner No.1 in respect of the subject

property. Thereafter, petitioner No.1 sold the subject

property in favour of petitioner No.2. Since the said

property was identified for construction of a community hall,

petitioner No.2 executed a registered sale deed in favour of

respondent No.4.

Such being the case, notice was issued to the

petitioners calling upon them to pay the amount received

under the Sale Deed alleging that the property which was

sold in favour of respondent No.4 is a Government Kharab

land. The petitioner in pursuance of said notice repaid the

sale consideration, which was received from respondent

No.4. Thereafter, respondent No.4 by communication dated

03.01.2017 requested respondent No.5 to lodge the FIR

against the petitioners-accused for having got the khatha

registered in their favour and having sold the government

property illegally in favour o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top