SRI K VENKATASWAMY GOWDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
Sri.M.Narayana Reddy, learned counsel accepts notice
for respondent No.3.
Petitioner No.1 who was in possession of the
subject property submitted an application to respondent
No.4 to register the khatha in his favour. Respondent No.4
after inviting objections from the public registered the
-3-
khatha in favour of petitioner No.1 in respect of the subject
property. Thereafter, petitioner No.1 sold the subject
property in favour of petitioner No.2. Since the said
property was identified for construction of a community hall,
petitioner No.2 executed a registered sale deed in favour of
respondent No.4.
Such being the case, notice was issued to the
petitioners calling upon them to pay the amount received
under the Sale Deed alleging that the property which was
sold in favour of respondent No.4 is a Government Kharab
land. The petitioner in pursuance of said notice repaid the
sale consideration, which was received from respondent
No.4. Thereafter, respondent No.4 by communication dated
03.01.2017 requested respondent No.5 to lodge the FIR
against the petitioners-accused for having got the khatha
registered in their favour and having sold the government
property illegally in favour o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.