2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 52688
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MFA No.2519 OF 2020(MV)
C/W MFA No.4621 OF 2020 (MV)
IN MFA No.2519 OF 2020
BETWEEN
THE RELIANCE GENERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR
NO.28, CENTENARY BUILDING
M G ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
NOW REPRESENTED BY MANAGER LEGAL
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI ASHOK N PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND
1 . GANGADHARA C V
S/O VENKATESHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
R/AT MAACHINNEPALLI VILLAGE
NALLAPPAREDDIPALLI,
BAGEPALLI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 3 561207
2
2 . THE MANAGER
NITHYA ENETERPRISES
OFFICE AT THAVAREKERE VILLAGE
NANDAGUDI HOBLI
HOSAKOTE TALUK
BENGALURU - 562114
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI TEJAS.N, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST
THE
AWARD
DATED
13.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.4474/2018 ON THE
FILE OF THE X ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL
CAUSES,
MOTOR
ACCIDENT
CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL,
BENGALURU (SCCH-16), AWARDING COMPENSATION
OF RS.16,09,600/- WITH INTEREST AT 9 PERCENT
P.A. (EXCLUDING FUTURE MEDICAL EXPENSES OF
RS.2,50,000/-) FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL
REALIZATION.
IN MFA No.4621 OF 2020
SRI GANGADHARA C V
S/O. VENKATESHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
R/AT MAACHINNEPALLI VILLAGE,
NALLAPPAREDDIPALLI,
BAGEPALI TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-561 207.
(BY SRI TEJAS N, ADVOCATE)
3
1 .
THE MANAGER
NITHYA ENTERPRISES,
OFFICE AT THAVAREKERE VILLAGE,
NANDAGUDI HOBLI,
HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE-562 114.
(OWNER OF TIPPER BEARING REG. NO.KA-53-C-
9109)
2 .
THE MANAGER
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
NO.28, EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR,
CENTENARY BUILDING,
M.G. ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.
(POLICY NO.141521823340034780 VALID FROM
05-05-2018 TO 04-05-2019)
(BY SRI ASHOK N. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH)
JUDGMENT
AWARD
DATED
13.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.4474/2018 ON THE
FILE OF THE X ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL
CAUSES, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-16), PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION
AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
4
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION
THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
MFA 2519/2020 is filed by the Insurance
Company and MFA 4621/2020 is filed by the claimant
under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
(hereinafter referred to as 8the Act9) being aggrieved
by the judgment and decree dated 13.1.2020 passed
by Court of Small Causes and MACT, Bengaluru in
MVC 4474/2018.
2.
Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeals
briefly stated are that on 14.7.2018, the claimant was
proceeding on his motorcycle near Shanthinekethana
School at Bagapalli, at that time, tipper lorry bearing
registration No.KA-53-C-9109 being driven by its
driver at a high speed and in a rash and negligent
manner, dashed to the vehicle of the claimant. As a
5
result
of
the
aforesaid
accident,
the
claimant
sustained grievous injuries and was hospitalized.
3.
The claimant filed a petition under Section
166 of the Act seeking compensation. It was pleaded
that
he
spent
huge
amount
towards
medical
expenses, conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded
that the accident occurred purely on account of the
rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by
its driver.
4.
On service of notice, the respondent No.2
appeared through counsel and filed written statement
in which the averments made in the petition were
denied. It was pleaded that the petition itself is false
and frivolous in the eye of law. It was further pleaded
that the accident was due to the rash and negligent
riding of the vehicle by the claimant himself. The
6
liability is subject to terms and conditions of the
policy. Hence, he sought for dismissal of the petition.
The respondent No.1 did not appear before the
Tribunal inspite of service of notice and was placed
ex-parte.
5.
On the basis of the pleadings of the parties,
the Claims Tribunal framed the issues and thereafter
recorded the evidence. The claimant himself was
examined as PW-1 and Dr.Ramesh was examined as
PW-4 and two more witnesses as PW-2 and 3 and got
exhibited documents namely Ex.P1 to Ex.P33. On
behalf of the respondents, neither any witness was
examined nor any document was produced. The
Claims Tribunal, by the impugned judgment, inter alia,
held that the accident took place on account of rash
and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its
driver, as a result of which, the claimant sustained
injuries. The Tribunal further held that the claimant is
7
entitled to a compensation of Rs.16,09,600/- along
with interest at the rate of 9% p.a. and directed the
Insurance Company to deposit the compensation
amount along with interest. Being aggrieved, these
appeals have been filed.
6.
The learned counsel for the Insurance
Company has raised following contentions:
Firstly, the claimant claims t