- 1 -
CRL.P No. 102636 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102636 OF 2022 (439-)
BETWEEN:
SRI BASALING GURAPPA GORAWADE
AGE. 48, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. NIDAGUNDI VILLAGE,
TAL. RAIBAG,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591317
&PETITIONER
(SRI. SIDDANGOUDA B. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SANTOSH B MALAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH P S I RAIBAG POLICE STATION,
R/BY ADDL. SPP,
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OFFICE
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH-580011
2.
SRI. VITHAL BHIMAPPA ALIAS BHIMA HIREKODI
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O. SIDDESHWAR NAGAR,
NIDAGUNDI, TAL. RAIBAG,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591317
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V.MOGALI, HCGP FOR R1;
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102636 of 2022
R2 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT CRIMINAL PETITION AND THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED MAY BE DIRECTED TO BE RELEASED ON BAIL
IN
RAIBAG
P.S.
CRIME
NO.188/2022
FOR
THE
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE U/S 4, 5(k), 6 OF POCSO ACT 2012, U/S 376(2)(J),
376(2)(f), 376(2)(L), 341, 342 OF IPC, IN SO FAR AS PRESENT
PETITIONER/ACCUSED IS CONCERNED.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking bail in Crime No.188/2022
of Raibag police station for the offences punishable under
Sections 4, 5(k), 6 of POCSO Act, and under Section
376(2)(j), 376(2)(f), 376(2)(l), 341, 342 of IPC.
The case of the prosecution is that, one Vithal
Bhiamppa @ Bhima Hirekodi, the father of the victim-girl
has filed complaint stating that he is residing in his house
situated at Siddeshwar nagar along with his family
consisting
of
two
wives
and
eight
children.
The
complainant-Bharati who is the first wife has three
children including the victim-girl and he is married to
- 3 -
Gangavva who is his first wife9s sister who is having five
children. It is further stated that, the victim-girl is
mentally disabled, she is deaf and dumb by birth and due
to that she was not going to school and staying at home.
It is further stated that on 25.07.2022 at about 9.00 a.m.,
he and his first wife Bharati had been to coolie work and
his second wife along with the victim-girl was in the house
and other children had been to school. At about 4.00 p.m.,
when he came to the house, the victim-girl was not seen
at the house and on enquiry it was revealed to him that
since 3.00 p.m. she was playing outside and he started
searching her, and near the toilet room of the petitioner
he heard distressing voice and he knocked the door which
was locked from inside and after some time, the present
petitioner/accused ran away from the said toilet room and
he tried to apprehend him, but failed to do so. The
complainant saw his daughter victim-girl lying there with
her dress and innerwear in an inappropriate manner. It is
further stated that, the petitioner/accused has sexually
assaulted the victim-girl knowing that she is mentally
- 4 -
disabled i.e. deaf and dumb. It is further stated that,
because of the social stigma attached to his family for the
alleged act committed by the petitioner they did not
disclose the incident to anybody and on 26.07.2022 he
consulted
his
brothers
and
thereafter
lodged
the
complaint. The said complaint came to be registered by
the Raibag Police in Crime No.188/2022 for the aforesaid
offences.
The
petitioner
came
to
be
arrested
on
27.07.2022. He is in judicial custody. The petitioner filed
Criminal Misc. No.1125/2022 seeking bail and the same
came to be rejected by the Additional District and Sessions
Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi, by order dated 30.08.2022.
Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court seeking bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for
the petitioner and the learned HCGP for the respondent-
State.
4.
In spite of service of notice, the respondent
No.2 remained absent and un-represented.
- 5 -
5.
Learned
counsel
for
the
petitioner
would
contend that, there is a delay in filing the complaint. The
accused is innocent and he has not committed any offence
as alleged and he has been falsely implicated in the case.
It is his further submission that, even after the alleged
incident, the petitioner was in the village which itself
shows that, he is innocent and not committed any offence
as alleged. It is his further submission that, the Doctor
who examined the victim-girl has noted that, there are no
injuries over the Labia Majora, Labia Minora, Buttocks,
vagina. The hymen is intact and no bleeding, no tears and
rectum is intact and no bleeding and no tears. The Doctor
further noted that the vaginal smear is negative for
spermatozoa, vaginal swab and smear negative for
gonococci, USG3Abd and pelvis no sonological abnormality
and her dental age is 14-15 years and her skeletal age is
above 14 years and below 16 years. She has not attained
menarche. She cannot speak and hear. It is his further
submission that the very fact that there are no injuries
and hymen is intact itself shows that the allegations are
- 6 -
false. It is his further submission that the Doctor who
examined the petitioner/accused has stated that, there are
no external injuries over her bod
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.