1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1003 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
LALITH PARMAR,
S/O SHAMSHU,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VARAKENDA VILLAGE,
DAVOD TALUK AND DISTRICT,
GUJARATH 3 389 151.
2.
BABOR AJAY KUMAR NAGARBAI,
S/O NAGARBAI,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
RESIDING AT PATIYA VILLAGE,
PATIYA POST, GARBAD TALUK,
DAVOD TALUK AND DISTRICT
GUJARATH 3 389 151.
3.
RAKESH BAI PARMAR @ RAKESH,
S/O BASUBAI PARMAR,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KEDA VILLAGE,
DAVOD DISTRICT,
GUJARATH 3 389 151.
&PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.PRASANNA RAO R., ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
STATE BY JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU 3 560 001.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.RAHUL RAI K., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
439 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL IN CR.NO.72/2021 OF JAYANAGAR P.S., TUMAKURU
DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 454, 457, 380 OF IPC,
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE IV ADDL. CIVIL
JUDGE (JD) AND 5TH J.M.F.C. TUMKUR.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Heard Sri.Prasanna Rao R, learned counsel for the
petitioners and learned High Court Government Pleader for
the respondent-State and perused the records.
2.
The present petition is filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C.
3.
It is submitted that the present petitioners are
not arrested in Crime No.72/2021. However, the petitioners
3
are facing trial in another Crime No.59/2021 by Jayanagar
Police Station, Tumakuru.
4.
It is contended that the present petitioners have
been produced before the trial Court in this case under the
pretext of body warrant (Production of body warrant as is
contemplated under Section 267 Cr.P.C.,) which reads as
under:
267. Power to require attendance of
prisoners.
(1) Whenever, in the course of an
inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this
Code, it appears to a Criminal Court,-
(a) that a person confined or detained in
a prison should be brought before the Court for
answering to a charge of an offence, or for the
purpose of any proceedings against him, or
(b) that it is necessary for the ends of
justice to examine such person as a witness,
the Court may make an order requiring the
officer in charge of the prison to produce such
person before the Court for answering to the
4
charge or for the purpose of such proceeding
or, as the case may be, for giving evidence.
(2) Where an order under sub- section
(1) is made by a Magistrate of the second
class, it shall not be forwarded to, or acted
upon by, the officer in charge of the prison
unless it is countersigned by the Chief Judicial
Magistrate
to
whom
such
Magistrate
is
subordinate.
(3)
Every
order
submitted
for
countersigning under sub- section (2) shall be
accompanied by a statement of the facts
which, in the opinion of Magistrate, render the
order
necessary,
and
the
Chief
Judicial
Magistrate to whom it is submitted may, after
considering
such
statement,
decline
to
countersign the order.
5.
Section 439 Cr.P.C reads as under:
439. Special powers of High Court or
Court of Session regarding bail.
(1) A High Court or Court of Session may
direct-
5
(a) that any person accused of an
offence and in custody be released on bail, and
if the offence is of the nature specified in
subsection (3) of section 437, may impose any
condition which it considers necessary for the
purposes mentioned in that sub- section;
(b) that any condition imposed by a
Magistrate when releasing an person on bail be
set aside or modified: Provided that the High
Court or the Court of Session shall, before
granting bail to a person who is accused of an
offence which is triable exclusively by the
Court of Session or which, though not so
triable, is punishable with imprisonment for
life, give notice of the application for bail to the
Public Prosecutor unless it is, for reasons to be
recorded in writing, of opinion that it is not
practicable to give such notice.
(2) A High Court or Court of Session may
direct that any person who has been released
on bail under this Chapter be arrested and
commit him to custody.
6
6.
On conjoint reading of both the provisions, it is
crystal clear that, to entertain the petition under Section 439
Cr.P.C, a person must be arrested and detained in the
custody is a sine qua non factor.
7.
Since, there is no formal arrest in the case on
hand and the present petitioners are detained under the
pretext of body warrant issued under Section 267 Cr.P.C,
with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate
application, the present petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
GH
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.