- 1 -
CRL.P No. 100432 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100432 OF 2021 (482)
BETWEEN:
PRAKASH S/O CHAYAPPA PASALKAR
AGE. 56 YEARS,OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. MEDAR ONI,BAILHONGAL,
TQ. BAILHONGAL,
DIST. BELAGAVI-591102.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ P.MUDHOL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH KITTUR POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH,
AT DHARWAD. DIST. DHARWAD-580001
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K.UPPER, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN
KITTUR POLICE CRIME NO.0096/2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT AT KITTUR, DIST. BELAGAVI,
FOR AN OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 32 AND 34 OF
THE KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT, INSOFAR AS IT RELATES TO THE
PETITIONER (ACCUSED NO.4) IS CONCERNED BY ALLOWING
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Digitally signed
by ANNAPURNA
CHINNAPPA
DANDAGAL
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
DHARWAD
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 100432 of 2021
Heard leaned counsel, Sri Shivaraj P.Mudhol, for the
petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondent-State.
2.
This petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C. with the following prayer.
<To quash the entire criminal proceedings in
Kittur Police Crime No.0096/2019 pending on the
file of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court at
Kittur, Dist. Belagavi, for an offence punishable
under Section 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise
Act, insofar as it relates to the petitioner
(accused No.4) is concerned by allowing this
criminal petition.=
3.
Brief facts of the case are as under:
Petitioner has been charge sheeted for the offences
punishable under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka
Excise Act and summons have been issued and the same
is under challenge. The gist of the complaint averments
reveal that when the complainant was on duty, he
received credible information stating that two persons
- 3 -
carrying wine packets on their motorcycle proceeding from
M.K.Hubli towards Ambadgatti and were indulged in sale
of liquor. On credible information, head of the raid party
along with panch witnesses went to the spot and were on
watch and on confirmation, raided and captured the
person who was indulged in selling of the liquor sachets
illegally and he is arraigned as accused No.4 in the charge
sheet. Further, the police investigated and based on the
information collected by the police, accused Nos.1, 2 and
3 have also been arraigned as additional accused in the
case and they have been charge sheeted. The action of
the police is challenged in the present petition.
4.
Reiterating the grounds urged in the petition,
Sri Shivaraj P.Mudhol, learned counsel for the petitioner
vehemently contended that in the absence of any
incriminatory materials found against accused No.4, he
has been falsely implicated by the police in order to harass
him and therefore, sought for allowing the petition.
- 4 -
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader submits that, in the charge sheet materials
necessary
information
has
been
gathered
by
the
investigating agency to establish nexus between the
petitioner and the incident and therefore, sought for
dismissal of the petition.
6.
Perused the material on record meticulously, in
the light of rival contentions of the parties.
7.
Admittedly on the day of the raid, the police
were only able to catch accused No.1 to 3, where they
were found selling the liquor sachets kept in box.
Subsequent thereto, the police investigated the matter
and filed charge sheet against the present petitioner also.
The charge sheet materials do not indicate that, the liquor
sachets seized by the head of the raid party on the date of
raid were in fact supplied by accused No.4 from Savita
Wine Shop. No other material is forthcoming so as to
proceed against the petitioner.
- 5 -
8.
The investigation agency has not collected any
material to establish that the sold liquor packets are
actually purchased from petitioner9s shop or belongs to
petitioner. Under such circumstances, in the absence of
nexus, criminal action is impermissible.
9.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed
reliance on the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this
Court dated 02.07.2020 passed in Crl.P.No.100827/2019
and connected matters. In the said case, Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court has referred to other judgments of
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in paragraph Nos.10, 11
and 13 of its judgment. For ready reference paragraph
Nos.10, 11 and 13 are extracted hereunder.
<10. In a decision reported in (2013) 1
KCCR 334 case of K.Ramachandra Reddy Vs.
State of Karnataka by the Station House
Officer & Another, it is observed as under:
"23. The position in law will have to be
referred to at this juncture. This Court, in the
case M/s. Vijaya Bank Vs. State by the Labour
Enforcement Officer, reported in ILR 2000
Karnataka
4773,
has
held
that
taking
- 6 -
cognizance of an offence being a judicial act
after
application
of
kind,
the
Magistrate
Prof
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.