1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3918/2022
BETWEEN:
HARIPRASAD M,
S/O RAMESH BABU
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/AT NO.196, 1ST MAIN ROAD
3RD CROSS, NELLURPURAM
NEW THIPPASANDRA POST
BENGALURU-560075.
& PETITIONER
(BY SMT. NAGAMANI V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY JEEVAN BHIMANAGAR POLICE
STATION, BENGALURU
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-01.
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.K.KRISHNA KUMAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
CR.NO.63/2022 OF JEEVAN BHEEMANAGAR P.S., BENGALURU
CITY FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S 306 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE
10TH A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL, BENGALURU.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking
regular bail of the petitioner/accused No.1 in respect of Crime
No.63/2022 registered by Jeevan Bheemanagar Police Station,
Bengaluru City, for an offence punishable under Section 306 of
IPC.
2.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader
appearing for the respondent-State.
3.
The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is
that the complainant, who is the mother of the victim. In the
complaint, it is stated that she has performed the marriage of
her daughter eight years ago and the son-in-law passed away
due to jaundice and her daughter was working in Beauty Parlour
at Indiranagar. Then, she came in contact with this petitioner
and both of them loved each other and marriage was performed
on 14.02.2022. It is also alleged in the complaint that he used
3
to consume alcohol and subjecting her for both mental and
physical harassment and also suspecting her fidelity and making
comment on her second marriage. That on 26.03.2022, the
victim went to her elder sister9s house, wherein also, she has
reiterated with regard to subjecting her for both mental and
physical harassment. She consoled her. On the same day at
8:30 p.m, she called her mother and also complained about the
act of her husband and threatening her to go and die, she also
consoled her. In the night at around 3 a.m, the police have
informed that she has committed suicide. Based on the
complaint, the police have registered a case, investigated the
matter and filed the charge-sheet.
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that no such harassment meted out to the victim
and this is the second marriage of the victim with the petitioner
and this petitioner never indulged in any such act as alleged in
the complaint and there is no proximity to cause of death i.e.,
abating to take the extreme step of committing suicide. The
4
Police have already investigated the matter and filed the charge-
sheet.
5.
Per contra, the learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for the State would submit that the marriage
was solemnized in the month of February, the death was taken
place in the month of March and also the specific allegations are
made subjecting her for humiliation and hence, she took
extreme step of committing suicide. Hence, there is a prima
facie case against the petitioner herein.
6.
Having heard the respective counsel appearing for
the parties and also on perusal of the material available on
record, only the contents of the complaint is that this petitioner
used to subjected her for both mental and physical harassment,
no specific date of assault is mentioned in the complaint. Apart
from that, with regard to she went and discloses the same with
the elder sister and also on the same day night she had called
and informed the mother. In order to substantiate whether she
has called on that day and informed the same to the mother, no
material had been collected by the Investigating Officer during
5
the course of investigation. While invoking Section 306 of IPC,
there must be proximity to cause of death. No doubt, an
allegation is made that she took the extreme step of committing
suicide and only found ligature marks, no other injuries are
found on the dead body with regard to subjecting her for
physical assault. Since the petitioner is in custody from March
2022, no need of custodial trial. Hence, it is a fit case to
exercise the powers under Section 439 of Corp., subject to
imposing certain conditions to protect and safeguard the interest
of the prosecution. Hence, I pass the following:-
ORDER
The
Petition
is
allowed.
Consequently,
the
petitioner/accused No.1 shall be released on bail in Crime
No.63/2022 registered by Jeevan Bheemanagar Police Station,
Bengaluru City, for an offence punishable under Section 306 of
IPC, subject to the following conditions:-
(i)
The petitioner shall execute personal bond for
a sum of Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.