NARASAPPA @ RAJANNA – Appellant
Versus
B.C.RANGANNA @ ARJUNAIAH – Respondent
The captioned Second Appeal is filed by the
defendants feeling aggrieved by the divergent findings
recorded by the Courts below. The Appellate Court has
decreed the suit in entirety.
2.
For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred
to as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3.
The plaintiff instituted a suit in O.S.No.218/2001
seeking relief of declaration of title and for permanent
injunction. The subject matter of the suit are three
agricultural lands which are referred as item Nos.1 to 3 in
the schedule. Plaintiff claimed that item Nos. 1 and 2 are
ancestral properties and after the death of defendant's
father, defendant has sold item Nos.1 and 2 under the
registered sale deeds dated 14.05.1971 and 23.09.1971
vide Exs.P.7 and 8. The plaintiff further contended that he
has jointly purchased item No.3 along with defendant
under
registered
sale
deed
dated
28.10.1969
and
4
therefore, claimed that he is entitled for 1/2 share in the
schedule property. On these set of pleadings, plaintiff
claimed relief of declaration and injunction.
4. Defendant on receipt of summons tendered appearance.
Defendant admitted the claim of plaintiff insofar as item
No.3 is concerned. Defen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.