SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NARASAPPA @ RAJANNA – Appellant
Versus
B.C.RANGANNA @ ARJUNAIAH – Respondent


The captioned Second Appeal is filed by the

defendants feeling aggrieved by the divergent findings

recorded by the Courts below. The Appellate Court has

decreed the suit in entirety.

2.

For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred

to as per their rank before the Trial Court.

3.

The plaintiff instituted a suit in O.S.No.218/2001

seeking relief of declaration of title and for permanent

injunction. The subject matter of the suit are three

agricultural lands which are referred as item Nos.1 to 3 in

the schedule. Plaintiff claimed that item Nos. 1 and 2 are

ancestral properties and after the death of defendant's

father, defendant has sold item Nos.1 and 2 under the

registered sale deeds dated 14.05.1971 and 23.09.1971

vide Exs.P.7 and 8. The plaintiff further contended that he

has jointly purchased item No.3 along with defendant

under

registered

sale

deed

dated

28.10.1969

and

4

therefore, claimed that he is entitled for 1/2 share in the

schedule property. On these set of pleadings, plaintiff

claimed relief of declaration and injunction.

4. Defendant on receipt of summons tendered appearance.

Defendant admitted the claim of plaintiff insofar as item

No.3 is concerned. Defen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top