2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 58254
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5153/2022
BETWEEN:
1 .
DEVAPPA
S/O BASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
2 .
UMESH
S/O SHIVALINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
3 .
SHIVALINGAPPA
S/O LATE BASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
4 .
MANJAPPA
S/O DEVAPPA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT CHENNAMALLIPURA
VILLAGE, GUNDLUPET TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571111.
& PETITIONERS
(BY SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K.A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY THE POLICE OF GUNDLUPET POLICE STATION
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571111
2
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU -560001.
& RESPONDENT
(BY SRI H.S.SHANKAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438
OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
THE
EVENT
OF
HIS
ARREST
IN
CR.NO.126/2022
OF
GUNDLUPETE P.S., CHAMARAJANAGARA FOR THE OFFENCES
P/U/Ss.341, 307 R/W. 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
LEARNED
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC,
GUNDLUPETE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying
this Court to enlarge the petitioners/accused on bail in the event
of their arrest in respect of Crime No.126/2022 registered by
Gundlupete Police Station, Chamarajanagara District, for the
offences punishable under Sections 341, 307 read with 34 of
IPC.
2.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader
appearing for the respondent-State.
3
3.
The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is
that there was a civil dispute between the parties. That on
26.04.2022 at about 10:00 a.m, one of the petitioners -
Devappa was cultivating the land by using the tractor, when he
told that not to flow the land until partition takes place, these
petitioners took him near the house of Devappa and abused him
with an intention to take away his life forcibly administered the
poison and he cannot tell, who were present at the time of
administering the poison forcibly and he was in JSS Hospital,
when he regained the conscious. Based on the complaint, the
police have registered a case for the offences punishable under
Sections 341, 307 read with 34 of IPC.
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
would submit that the wife of petitioner No.1 has filed a
complaint, which is registered as Crime No.119/2022. The
learned counsel also would submit that the wife of the
complainant also filed a complaint, which is registered as Crime
No.117/2022. In the said case, these petitioners have been
enlarged on bail. The learned counsel also would submit that
4
though the incident was taken place on 26.04.2022 after five
days of the incident, the present complaint has been filed and
the same is also by the husband of the earlier complainant and
registered as Crime No.126/2022. This complaint is an after
thought. The very complaint itself discloses that he cannot tell
who are all there at the time of forcibly administering the poison
to him. Hence, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
5.
Per contra, the learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for the State would submit that though two
cases are registered an attempt was made to take away the life
of Devappa. Hence, the very presence of the petitioners is
required to probe the matter.
6.
Having heard the respective counsel and on perusal
of the material available on record with regard to the very same
incident already three cases have been registered in Crime
Nos.117/2022
and
119/2022
and
the
present
Crime
No.126/2022. This complaint is filed after five days of the
incident. In the complaint, the complainant says that he cannot
tell who are all present at the time of forcibly administering the
5
poison to him. Having taken note of the gravity of the offences
and accusations made in the complaint and also the case and
counter case are registered between the parties, it is a fit case to
exercise the discretion in favour of the petitioners under Section
438 of Cr.P.C., subject to the condition that they have to appear
before the Investigating Officer to assist him for investigation.
7.
In view of the discussions made above, I pass the
following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioners shall
be released on bail in the event of their arrest in respect of
Crime No.126/2022 registered by Gundlupete Police Station,
Chamarajanagara District, for the offences punishable under
Sections 341, 307 read with 34 of IPC, subject to the following
conditions:-
(i)
The petitioners shall surrender themselves
before the Investigating Officer within ten days
from the date of receipt of a certified copy of
this order and shall execute a personal bond
for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs
only) each with two sureties each for the like-
6
sum to the satisfaction of the concerned
Investigating Officer.
(ii)
The petitioners shall not indulge in hampering
the investigation or tampering the prosecution
witnesses.
(iii)
The petitioners shall co-operate with the
In