1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
M.F.A. NO.3324/2020 (SMA)
BETWEEN:
MRS. JOSEPHINE
W/O EDGAR RAJDAYAL ALLAN
AGE: 53 YEARS
OCC UNEMPLOYED
R/O NO.14, MAIGANDA DEVA
MUDALIAR ROAD, FRAZER TOWN
BENGALURU - 560 005.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 43/2
CHRIST NIVAS, VENKATESHAPPA
LAYOUT, N BEERAPPA ROAD
M.S. NAGAR POST, KAMMANAHALLI
BANGALORE - 560 033.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI ASIM MALIK, ADV.)
AND:
MR. EDGAR RAJDAYAL ALLAN
S/O ALLAN P V
AGE: 52 YEARS
OCC PRIVATE R/O NO 14
MAIGANDA DEVA, MUDALIAR
ROAD, FRAZER TOWN
BENGALURU - 560 005. ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SHRIDHARA K., ADV.)
2
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 39 OF SMA,
READ WITH SECTION 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT,
1984, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE
THE
PART
OF
THE
DECREE
DATED
04.09.2019 IN M.C. NO.3508/2015 PASSED BY THIE LEARNED
PRL.
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
BANGALORE,
THEREBY
DISMISSING THE APPLICATION U/S 37 OF THE SPECIAL
MARRIAGE ACT, 1594 FILED BY THE APPELLANT SEEKING
PERMANENT ALIMONY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL DISPOSAL THIS
DAY,
VISHWAJITH
SHETTY
J.,
DELIVERED
FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
This miscellaneous first appeal is filed assailing the
judgment and decree dated 04.09.2019 passed by the
Principal
Judge,
Family
Court,
Bengaluru
in
M.C.No.3508/2015 wherein the Family Court had allowed
the petition filed by the respondent - husband under
Section 27(1)(d) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954
(hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1954") and the
marriage between the parties registered on 21.04.1993
before the Registrar of Marriages, Bengaluru and
subsequently, solemnized on 11.11.1994 at St.John's
Church, Bengaluru was dissolved by decree of divorce
and the application filed by the appellant - wife under
3
Section 37 of the Act of 1954 seeking permanent alimony
was also dismissed.
2.
We have heard the learned counsel appearing
for the parties and also perused the material available on
record.
3.
Brief facts leading to filing of this appeal as
revealed from the records are, the marriage of the
appellant with the respondent was registered before the
Registrar of Marriages, Bengaluru and subsequently,
solemnized
on
11.11.1994
at
St.John's
Church,
Bengaluru as per Christian rites and traditions. For short
period after marriage, the couple were living happily and
thereafter their relationship had strained and they were
quarrelling on petty issues. From the marriage, the
couple had no biological issues and therefore, they
adopted a girl child was named as Renae Nakshatra
Allan. Even thereafter, the relationship between the
parties did not improve and ultimately, the respondent -
husband had filed petition under Section 27(1)(d) of the
Act of 1954 seeking dissolution of marriage on the
ground of cruelty. The appellant - wife had entered
4
appearance in the said proceedings and filed detailed
statement of objections denying the petition averments
and also contended that the respondent was addicted to
alcohol and he used to treat her indifferently and never
allowed her to mingle with any of his relatives and child.
To substantiate his case, the respondent - husband had
examined himself as P.W.1 and got marked 39
documents and on the other hand, the appellant - wife
examined herself as R.W.1 and got marked Ex.R.1 to R9.
After completion of evidence, the appellant - wife had
filed I.A.No.V under Section 37 of the Act of 1954 with a
prayer for awarding Rs.3 crores as permanent alimony.
The Family Court vide the impugned judgment and
decree had allowed the petition filed by the respondent -
husband and had dismissed the application - I.A.No.V
filed by the appellant - wife. Being aggrieved by the
impugned judgment and decree in so far as it relates to
rejection of the application-I.A.No.V filed under Section
37 of the Act of 1954 , the appellant - wife has preferred
this appeal.
5
4.
The learned counsel for the appellant submits
that the Family Court was not justified in dismissing the
application -I.A.No.V filed by the appellant - wife under
Section 37 of the Act of 1954. He further submits that
since the learned Judge has dissolved the marriage by
decree of divorce, he ought to have granted permanent
alimony to the appellant - wife as sought.
5.
Per
contra,
learned
counsel
for
the
respondent has argued in support of the impugned
judgment and decree and submits considering the
evidence on record, the learned Judge has rightly
dismissed the application filed under Section 37 of the
Act of 1954 by the appellant - wife and the same does
not calls for any interference.
6.
The material on record would go to show that
the couple have no biological issue from the marriage
and they had adopted a girl child who was named as
Renae Nakshatra Allan and she is aged about 19 years at
present and adm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.