SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32307

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
M.A. MOEEZ MANIYAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS – Respondent


The petitioner has filed a petition seeking damages

against respondents on the ground that his shop bearing

CMC No.06-07-58 (old), CMC No.06-07-62 (new) situated

opposite

Masjid

Rathkalpura,

Main

Road,

Bidar

is

demolished by respondents on the pretext of widening the

road.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that in terms of the order dated 20.01.2017 passed

in W.P.No.201708/2015 and order dated 01.08.2013

passed in W.P.No.101952/2013 and connected matters,

the

respondents

authority

has

awarded

appropriate

compensation to the similarly placed persons whose

properties have been acquired to widen the road.

The

writ petitioner has not produced any documents before this

Court to show that his property is acquired/utilized to

widen the road.

4

The respondents authority would submit that,

they have not acquired/utilized the property of the

petitioner to widen the road. Nevertheless, the petitioner

has produced a photograph which is marked at Annexure-

H which indicates the building is demolished. However, it

is not forthcoming from the photograph who is the owner

of the property and where the property is located.

However, this Court is of the opinion that, in the event, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top