SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SMT AMBIKA G NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
SRI GANESH S NAYAK – Respondent


DECREE

DATED

27.11.2021

PASSED

IN

OS

NO.72/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

AND ACJM, UDUPI, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND

MANDATORY INJUCTION.

IN R.F.A CROB NO.8 OF 2022

GANESH S. NAYAK

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

MANGALORE - 575 022. & CROSS OBJECTOR

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

R/AT HOUSE NO.43B

UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 576 104. &RESPONDENT

(BY SHRI. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)

THIS RFA CROB IS FILED UNDER 41 RULE 22 OF THE CPC,

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.11.2021 PASSED IN

OS NO.72/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND ACJM, UDUPI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR

DECLARATION AND INJUCTION.

THIS RFA AND RFA CROB COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS

DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

3

JUDGMENT

These two appeals are directed against the judgment

and decree dated November 27, 2021, in O.S.No.72/2015

passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJM,

Udupi.

2.

RFA No.313/2022 is filed by the defendant-wife and

RFA Crob.No.8/2022 is filed by the plaintiff-husband.

3.

For the sake of convenience, parties shall be referred

as per their status before the Trial Court.

4.

Pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top