2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 31131
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102969 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
REHKHA W/O. KALMESH BOGUR
@ REKHA D/O. MALLESHAPPA KESARALLI
AGE.27 YEARS, OCC. SINGER,
R/O. SAI NAGAR, KELGERI ROAD, DHARWAD
NOW AT SANTOSH NAGAR, DHARWAD.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VASANT.G.HOLEYANNAVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPT. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD,
PI WOMEN POLICE STATION,
HUBLI-DHARWAD, HUBLI.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH V. MOGALI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO ORDER RELEASE OF THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1
ON BAIL IN WOMEN POLICE STATION HUBLI DHARWAD POLICE
STATION CRIME NO.62/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 3,
4, 5, 6 OF IMMORAL TRAFFIC PREVENTION ACT 1956 AND SECTION
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 102969 of 2022
370 OF IPC, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC 2ND
COURT, DHARWAD.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition is filed by the sole accused under
Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 8Cr.P.C.9, for
brevity) seeking bail in Crime No.62/2022 of
Hubballi-Dharwad
City
Women
Police
Station
registered
for
the
offences
punishable
under
Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 of Immoral Traffic Prevention
Act, 1956 and Section 370 of The Indian Penal
Code (hereinafter referred to as the 8IPC9, for
brevity).
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, Smt.
R.
F.
Bharamappanavar,
P.I.,
Women
Police
Station, Hubballi-Dharwad has filed the complaint
stating that on 23.08.2022 at about 12.30 p.m.,
- 3 -
she received credible information that in a house
situated at Santosh Nagar, 4th cross, Kelageri
Road, Dharwad, belonging to Ghatage, there is a
women trafficking and running brothel for illegal
money by calling the customers to the house for
sexual intercourse. The said complaint came to be
registered
in
Crime
No.62/2022
of
Hubballi-
Dharwad Women Police Station for the aforesaid
offences.
The report of the Investigating Officer reveals
that on registering the case the Police Inspector
and other Police staff raided the house and found
the petitioner and the victim lady. On enquiring
the victim lady, she disclosed that the petitioner is
sending the customers for sexual intercourse with
her and the petitioner is giving money for the said
work. There were three customers in the said
house. On enquiring with the customers they
disclosed that in the said house there was brothel
- 4 -
and hence they visited the said house to have
sexual intercourse with the ladies. They also
disclosed that they have paid Rs.1,000/- to the
victim. The Police arrested the petitioner/accused
and protected the victim and seized Rs.500/-, one
mobile phone of this petitioner/accused and also
seized Rs.500/-, two condoms from the victim
under
Mahazar.
The
petitioner
came
to
be
arrested on 23.08.2022 and she is in judicial
custody.
The
petitioner
filed
Criminal
Miscellaneous No. 507/2022 seeking bail and the
same came to be rejected by the Principal District
and Sessions Judge, Dharwad by order dated
27.09.2022. Therefore, the petitioner/accused is
before this Court seeking bail.
3.
Heard the arguments of learned counsel
appearing for petitioner and learned High Court
Government Pleader for respondent-State.
- 5 -
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would
contend that the petitioner is innocent and has
not committed any offence as alleged, she has
been falsely implicated in this case. It is his
further
submission
that
the
petitioner
had
borrowed loan from the victim and she has not
repaid the same and therefore the victim lady has
filed a false complaint against her and the alleged
three customers are the relatives of the victim
lady. It is his further submission that major
portion of investigation is over and as the charge
sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for
custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed to
allow the petition.
5.
Per
contra,
learned
High
Court
Government Pleader contends that the statement
of the victim lady has been recorded under Section
164 of Cr.P.C. There is a recovery of mobile phone
and cash of Rs.500/- from this petitioner. The
- 6 -
charge sheet material shows prima facie case
against the petitioner/accused for the offences
alleged against her. The offences alleged against
the
petitioner
are
punishable
with
7
years
imprisonment and it may extend to life or 10 years
imprisonment. With this, he prayed to reject the
petition.
6.
Having regard to the submissions made
by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
High Court Government Pleader for respondent-
State, this Court has gone through the charge
sheet
records
and
the
order
passed
by
the
Sessions Court.
7.
The
accusation
against
the
petitioner/accused is that she was running brothel
and on raid in her premises the victim lady and
three customers are found. The mobile phone and
cash of Rs.500/- have been seized from the
- 7 -
p