SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 47329

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - BENCH AT DHARWAD
VINAYAK S/O NAGAPPA ANTANNAVAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SAVITA BHUVANESHWAR W/O VINAYAK ANTANNAVAR – Respondent


Both these appeals are filed by the husband. In MFA

No.100131/2021 he lays a challenge to the rejection of his

- 3 -

divorce petition. In the companion appeal in MFA

No.100132/2021, he lays a challenge to the decree for

restitution of conjugal rights obtained by the respondent-

wife. This estranged couple now has entered into an

amicable settlement with certain terms and to that effect a

compromise petition dated 27.05.2022 signed by the

parties and their respective Advocates is presented before

this Court.

II.

The terms of the compromise petition read as

under:

<1.

That the appellant and respondent have

amicably agreed to dissolve the marriage that has been

taken place between them on 11.05.2011 by decree of

divorce.

2.

The

appellant

herein

has

paid

Rs.15,00,000/- vide D.D.No.681726 drawn on Canara

Bank, Yaragatti Branch, Yaragatti dated 26.05.2022 and

Rs.3,00,000/-

by

way

of

cash

today

(in

total

Rs.18,00,000/- permanent alimony), in lieu of full and

final settlement towards permanent alimony to the

respondent/wife. The respondent/wife has accepted the

same for her life maintenance. As the respondent, has no

- 4 -

claims of maintenance, alimony or similar or any other

claims of an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top