2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39120
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
MFA NO.103064/2014
C/W.
MFA NO.103045/2014 &
MFA NO.103046/2014 (MV)
IN MFA NO.103064 OF 2014
BETWEEN
HAYATHSAB S/O JAMALSAB @ KOTIHAL,
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: TEMPO DRIVER WORK &
BUSINESS, R/O: KUPPELUR VILLAGE,
TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.M. H. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
KSRTC RAMANAGAR DIVISION,
DIST: RAMANAGAR.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. I. C. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV
ACT,
AGAINST
THE
AWARD
DATED
07.08.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.475/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, ADDITIONAL
2
MACT, RANEBENNUR PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION
FOR
COMPENSATION
SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT
OF
COMPENSATION.
IN MFA NO.103045/2014
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
KSRTC, RAMANAGAR
DIVISION, DT: RAMNAGAR,
RPTD.BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER
NWKRTC, CENTRAL OFFICE,
HUBLI.
(BY SRI.I. C. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: TEMPO DRIVING WORK &
BUSINESS, R/O. KUPPELUR VILLAGE,
TQ: RANEBENNUR, DT: HAVERI
(BY SRI.M H PATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF THE MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & AWARD
DATED:07.08.2014, PASSED IN MVC.NO.475/2013, ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MEMBER,
ADDITIONAL
MOTOR
ACCIDENT
CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL,
RANEBENNUR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.3,56,500/-
ALONG WITH THE INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 7% P.A. FROM
THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ACTUAL REALIZATION.
IN MFA NO.103046/2014
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
KSRTC, RAMANAGAR DIVISION,
DT: RAMANAGAR,
RPTD.BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER,
3
NWKRTC, CENTRAL OFFICE,
HUBLI.
(BY SRI.I C PATIL, ADVOCATE)
1 . NINGAPPA S/O BIDDAPPA HARAVI,
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: COCONUT AND
KIRANI STALL, BUSINESS,
R/O. MEDLERI VILLAGE,
TQ: RANEBENNUR, DT: HAVERI.
2 . MALLESHAPPA S/O NINGAPPA HARAVI
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: COOLI WORK,
R/O. MEDLERI VILLAGE,
TQ: RANEBENNUR, DT: HAVERI.
3 . BASAVARAJ S/O NINGAPPA HARAVI
AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: COOLI WORK,
R/O. MEDLERI VILLAGE,
TQ: RANEBENNUR, DT: HAVERI.
4 . SANTOSH S/O NINGAPPA HARAVI
AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: COOLI WORK,
R/O. MEDLERI VILLAGE,
TQ: RANEBENNUR, DT: HAVERI
…RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE TO R1-4 SERVED)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF THE MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & AWARD
DATED:07.08.2014, PASSED IN MVC.NO.476/2013, ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MEMBER,
ADDITIONAL
MOTOR
ACCIDENT
CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL,
RANEBENNUR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.1,39,200/-
ALONG WITH THE INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A. FROM
THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ACTUAL REALIZATION.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
S.G. PANDIT J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
JUDGMENT
All the three appeals arise out of common judgement
and award passed in MVC Nos.475/2013 and 476/2013 on
the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge & Additional
MACT, Ranebennur.
2.
MFA
No.103064/2014
arises
from
MVC
No.475/2013 which was filed by injured Hayathsab S/o
Jamalsab Gusihal @ Kotihal claiming compensation under
Section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act for the injuries sustained
by him in an accident that occurred on 09.02.2013
involving matador bearing No.KA-05/8136 and KSRTC bus
bearing No.KA-42/F-293. It is stated that the injured was
doing business as well as driving work and was earning a
sum of Rs.20,000.00 per month. He was aged 40 years as
on the date of accident.
MFA
No.103045/2014
as
well
as
MFA
No.103046/2014 are filed by the NWKRTC questioning the
liability fastened on it in the above stated jugdement and
award.
5
The claimants i.e., dependents of the deceased
Giriyamma
Haravi
were
before
this
Court
in
MFA
No.103065/2014 claiming enhancement of compensation
not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation
awarded under the above said judgement and award. The
said appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3.
Heard learned counsel Sri I. C. Patil for
NWKRTC. There is no representation for the respondents
and appellant in MFA No.103064/2014.
4.
The learned counsel, Sri I. C. Patil would
submit that NWKRTC is before this Court only questioning
the liability fastened on it in the judgement and award in
question. He submits that the accident had taken place
between two vehicles and the Tribunal committed an error
in fastening the liability on NWKRTC and the driver of the
bus. It is his submission that the accident had taken place
due to the contributory negligence of both the drivers of
bus as well as tempo. Further, he submits that the Tribunal
failed to appreciate the materials on record, particularly
6
EX.