Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2.

The petitioner herein has challenged the order

No.100/Rowdysheet dated 08.04.2016 passed by the

respondent No.5, produced at Annexure-H.

3

3.

Perusal of the writ papers would indicate that

the respondent authorities have issued Order No.1059 of

Karnataka Police Manual, 1998 against the petitioner and

being

aggrieved

by

the

same,

the

petitioner

has

approached this Court.

4.

Smt. Sharda Patil Kulgeri, learned counsel for

the petitioner submitted that there were two criminal cases

pending against the petitioner in C.C.No.400/2016 on the

file of the V Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kalaburagi,

and the petitioner has been acquitted and therefore, the

continuance of rowdy sheet against the petitioner is to be

quashed.

5.

Per contra, learned Additional Government

Advocate submitted that quashing of the rowdy sheet

would lead to harm the law and order in the society.

6.

Considering the submission made by the

learned counsel appearing for the parties and perusal of

the writ petition would indicate that the respondent police

authorities have passed an order No.1059 of Police

4

Manual, against the petitioner. It is evident from the writ

pe