Though this matter is listed for admission today, with the

consent of both the learned counsel it is taken up for final

disposal.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

appellant, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1-

Insurance Company and the learned counsel appearing for

respondent No.4-Insurance Company.

3

3.

This appeal is filed by the claimant challenging the

judgment

and

award

dated

30.08.2013

passed

in

M.V.C.No.6834/2010 on the file of the MACT., Court of Small

Causes, Bengaluru City (SCCH-10) (8the Tribunal9 for short),

questioning the quantum of compensation.

4.

The parties are referred to as per their original

rankings before the Tribunal to avoid confusion and for the

convenience of the Court.

5.

The

Tribunal

after

considering

both

oral

and

documentary evidence, considered 15% disability as against the

Doctor evidence of 42% to the whole body and taken the income

of Rs.5,000/- per month and awarded compensation of

Rs.3,14,000/- on all the heads. Hence, the present is filed by

the claimant seeking for enhancement of compensation.

6.

The

learned

counsel

appearing

for

the

appellant/claimant would vehemently contend that the claimant

suffered the com