2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33750
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4498/2022
BETWEEN:
SRINIVAS G,
S/O GOVINDARAJ,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/AT NO 7, 8C9 LINE,
ANJANAPPA GARDEN,
MYSORE ROAD,
BENGALURU 560053.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI BHADRAVADI SIDDESWARA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY SHESHADRIPURAM POLICE STATION,
BANGALORE CITY,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
BANGALORE 560009.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE
EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.6/2022 OF SESHADRIPURAM P.S.,
BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
120B, 465, 466, 468, 471, 472, 409, 420 AND 149 OF IPC ON THE
FILE OF THE IV ACMM, BANGALORE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying
this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his
arrest
in
respect
of
Crime
No.6/2022
registered
by
Seshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offences
punishable under Sections 120B, 465, 466, 468, 471, 472, 409,
420 and 149 of IPC.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the
respondent-State.
3.
The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is
that the BDA had invited the application for conducting e-auction
for sale of the sites through e-notification and this petitioner and
other accused persons, who are employed in BDA indulged in
creation of the document and the document was registered in
respect of site No.250/57 and this petitioner is the beneficiary of
the said site and hence caused loss to the BDA. Based on the
complaint, the police have registered the case and invoked the
offences under Sections 120B, 465, 466, 468, 471, 472, 409,
420 and 149 of IPC.
3
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in
total 35 cases are registered making similar allegations. In
other crimes, the other accused persons are enlarged on bail and
the allegation against this petitioner is that he is the beneficiary,
but he was not having any knowledge about the forgery and
creation of the documents. As an applicant, he had filed an
application and sale deed has been registered and whether he
had indulged in conspiracy with accused persons, the matter has
to be probed and this petitioner is ready to cooperate with the
Investigating Officer.
5.
Per contra, the learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for the respondent-State submits that this
petitioner along with outsourced employees of the BDA,
conspired with each other and created the documents and made
an attempt to knock off the property of the BDA and he being
the beneficiary is not entitled for bail.
6.
Having heard the respective learned counsel and also
on perusal of the material available on record, e-notification was
issued for conducting the auction of the sites belonging to the
BDA and this petitioner applied for allotment of the site by way
4
of auction. No doubt, he is the beneficiary and whether he had
indulged with other accused persons in conspiring with each
other to knock off the property of the BDA, the matter has to be
probed. Having taken note of the allegations, this Court can
exercise the powers under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. In similar
cases, this Court granted bail in other crime, which are similar in
nature and this Court can direct the petitioner to appear before
the Investigating Officer and cooperate for investigation.
7.
In view of the discussions made above, I pass the
following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner shall
be released on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with
Crime No.6/2022 of Seshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru,
for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 465, 466, 468,
471, 472, 409, 420 and 149 of IPC, subject to the following
conditions:
(i)
The petitioner shall surrender himself before
the Investigating Officer within ten days from
the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order and shall execute a personal bond for a
5
sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only)
with two sureties for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the concerned Investigating
Officer.
(ii)
The petitioner shall not indulge in hampering
the investigation or tampering the prosecution
witnesses.
(iii)
The
petitioner
shall
co-operate
with
the
Investigating
Officer
to
complete
the
investigation and he shall appear before the
Investigating Officer, as and when called for.
(iv)
The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of
the
Investigating
Officer
without
prior
permission till the charge-sheet is filed or for a
period of three months, whichever is earlier.
(v)
The petitioner shall mark his attendance once
in a month i.e., on 30th of every m