SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33750

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4498/2022

BETWEEN:

SRINIVAS G,

S/O GOVINDARAJ,

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

R/AT NO 7, 8C9 LINE,

ANJANAPPA GARDEN,

MYSORE ROAD,

BENGALURU 560053.

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI BHADRAVADI SIDDESWARA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

BY SHESHADRIPURAM POLICE STATION,

BANGALORE CITY,

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT COMPLEX,

BANGALORE 560009.

...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF

CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE

EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.6/2022 OF SESHADRIPURAM P.S.,

BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS

120B, 465, 466, 468, 471, 472, 409, 420 AND 149 OF IPC ON THE

FILE OF THE IV ACMM, BANGALORE.

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

2

This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying

this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his

arrest

in

respect

of

Crime

No.6/2022

registered

by

Seshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offences

punishable under Sections 120B, 465, 466, 468, 471, 472, 409,

420 and 149 of IPC.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the

respondent-State.

3.

The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is

that the BDA had invited the application for conducting e-auction

for sale of the sites through e-notification and this petitioner and

other accused persons, who are employed in BDA indulged in

creation of the document and the document was registered in

respect of site No.250/57 and this petitioner is the beneficiary of

the said site and hence caused loss to the BDA. Based on the

complaint, the police have registered the case and invoked the

offences under Sections 120B, 465, 466, 468, 471, 472, 409,

420 and 149 of IPC.

3

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in

total 35 cases are registered making similar allegations. In

other crimes, the other accused persons are enlarged on bail and

the allegation against this petitioner is that he is the beneficiary,

but he was not having any knowledge about the forgery and

creation of the documents. As an applicant, he had filed an

application and sale deed has been registered and whether he

had indulged in conspiracy with accused persons, the matter has

to be probed and this petitioner is ready to cooperate with the

Investigating Officer.

5.

Per contra, the learned High Court Government

Pleader appearing for the respondent-State submits that this

petitioner along with outsourced employees of the BDA,

conspired with each other and created the documents and made

an attempt to knock off the property of the BDA and he being

the beneficiary is not entitled for bail.

6.

Having heard the respective learned counsel and also

on perusal of the material available on record, e-notification was

issued for conducting the auction of the sites belonging to the

BDA and this petitioner applied for allotment of the site by way

4

of auction. No doubt, he is the beneficiary and whether he had

indulged with other accused persons in conspiring with each

other to knock off the property of the BDA, the matter has to be

probed. Having taken note of the allegations, this Court can

exercise the powers under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. In similar

cases, this Court granted bail in other crime, which are similar in

nature and this Court can direct the petitioner to appear before

the Investigating Officer and cooperate for investigation.

7.

In view of the discussions made above, I pass the

following:

ORDER

The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner shall

be released on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with

Crime No.6/2022 of Seshadripuram Police Station, Bengaluru,

for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 465, 466, 468,

471, 472, 409, 420 and 149 of IPC, subject to the following

conditions:

(i)

The petitioner shall surrender himself before

the Investigating Officer within ten days from

the date of receipt of a certified copy of this

order and shall execute a personal bond for a

5

sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only)

with two sureties for the like-sum to the

satisfaction of the concerned Investigating

Officer.

(ii)

The petitioner shall not indulge in hampering

the investigation or tampering the prosecution

witnesses.

(iii)

The

petitioner

shall

co-operate

with

the

Investigating

Officer

to

complete

the

investigation and he shall appear before the

Investigating Officer, as and when called for.

(iv)

The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of

the

Investigating

Officer

without

prior

permission till the charge-sheet is filed or for a

period of three months, whichever is earlier.

(v)

The petitioner shall mark his attendance once

in a month i.e., on 30th of every m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top