2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37728
- 1 -
CP No. 100081 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.DEVDAS
CIVIL PETITION NO. 100081 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SMT. KIRTHI W/O RAJSHEKHAR BARKER,
AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. LAXMINIVAS CTS NO. 7511/B SECTOR NO11.
MAHANTESH NAGAR, BELAGAVI - 590017
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHARAD V MAGADUM, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR. RAJSHEKHAR S/O VENKANNA BARKER
AGE. 35 YEARS, IOCC. ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
KARNATAKA COLLEGE DHARWAD, AT DHARWAD
R/O.CHALUKYA NAGAR BADAMI
TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOT.
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.SABEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL PETITION IS UNDER SECTION 24 OF CPC, PRAYING
TO ALLOW THIS CIVIL PETITION BY WITHDRAWING THE MC NO.
11/2022 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, BADAMI AND SAME MAY KINDLY BE
TRANSFERRED TO THE FAMILY COURT, BELAGAVI, IN THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS CIVIL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY.
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING.
- 2 -
CP No. 100081 of 2022
R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
Petitioner has filed this civil petition under Section 24
of CPC seeking transfer of M.C.No.11/2022 from the court
of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Badami to the Family
Court at Belagavi.
2.
It is the contention of the petitioner that she is
residing at Belagavi and she has already initiated two
proceedings in Crl.Misc.No.58/2022 and M.C.No.142/2022
which are pending before the courts at Belagavi and the
respondent has been attending to the court proceedings at
Belagavi. Moreover, the respondent is residing at Dharwad
but he has filed the matrimonial case at Badami being his
native place. The petitioner finds it difficult to travel from
Belagavi to Badami which is about 150 kms away.
3.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent
would contend that the respondent has not received notice
in M.C.No.142/2022 filed at the hands of the petitioner.
Learned counsel would submit that the respondent would
bear the travel expenses of the petitioner when she travels
- 3 -
from Belagavi to Badami to attend to the court
proceedings. As an alternative, it is also submitted that
the matter may be transferred to Dharwad and it would be
convenient for the petitioner to travel from Belagavi to
Dharwad and attend to the court proceedings. It is also
submitted that there is a threat to the respondent from
the brothers of the petitioner.
4.
Having heard the learned counsels and perusing
the petition papers, this court finds that balance of
convenience lies with the petitioner. The respondent has
already been attending at least one proceeding at Belagavi
and notice in respect of matrimonial case filed by the
petitioner is also said to have been issued to the
respondent. Therefore, at any rate the respondent is
required to attend to two proceedings at Belagavi.
Therefore, it would be more convenient if the matrimonial
case filed at the hands of the respondent is transferred
from Badami to Belagavi.
- 4 -
5.
Consequently, the civil petition is allowed. The
matrimonial case in M.C.No.11/2022 stands transferred
from the court of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Badami to
the Family Court at Belagavi. The Family Court at Belagavi
shall ensure that all the cases are listed on the same day
for the benefit of both the parties.
6.
Registry is directed to ensure that order passed
by this court is communicated to the learned Senior Civil
Judge and JMFC, Badami and the file is transferred to the
Family Court at Belagavi.
7.
The Family Court at Belagavi shall endeavour to
dispose of the proceedings as expeditiously as possible
and at any rate within a period of one year from the date
of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
Ordered accordingly.
SD
JUDGE
MBS