HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SRI HIMANSHU GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
V NARAYANA REDDY – Respondent
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question
the order dated 07.10.2021 passed in CC No.2024/2020
directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of cheque amount
under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 ( ‘N.I Act’ for short), as amended in the year 2018.
2.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner.
3.
The
respondent
though
served,
remains
unrepresented.
4.
The petitioner and the respondent had certain
transactions and certain cheques issued by the petitioner
in favor of the respondent/complainant appears to have
been dishonoured which leads to registration of the crime
3
invoking Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. for an offence
punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.
5. The present case is not with regard to the merit of
the claim of the complainant. In the proceedings i.e., in
C.C.No.2024/2020, the Court suo motu passes an order on
07.10.2021 directing payment of 20% of the amount
involved in the transaction without notifying the accused or
giving him an opportunity to file his objections. It is this
order that drives the petitioner-accused to this Court.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit that the complainant himself
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.