SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 31885

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SRI HIMANSHU GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
V NARAYANA REDDY – Respondent


The petitioner is before this Court calling in question

the order dated 07.10.2021 passed in CC No.2024/2020

directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of cheque amount

under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act,

1881 ( ‘N.I Act’ for short), as amended in the year 2018.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner.

3.

The

respondent

though

served,

remains

unrepresented.

4.

The petitioner and the respondent had certain

transactions and certain cheques issued by the petitioner

in favor of the respondent/complainant appears to have

been dishonoured which leads to registration of the crime

3

invoking Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. for an offence

punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.

5. The present case is not with regard to the merit of

the claim of the complainant. In the proceedings i.e., in

C.C.No.2024/2020, the Court suo motu passes an order on

07.10.2021 directing payment of 20% of the amount

involved in the transaction without notifying the accused or

giving him an opportunity to file his objections. It is this

order that drives the petitioner-accused to this Court.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that the complainant himself

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top