1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.DESAI
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100178/2021
BETWEEN:
SMT. YALLAWWA W/O SURENDRA UPPAR
AGE. 79 YEARS, OCC. MILK DAIRY,
R/O. NO.136, BASTI GALLI,
BASAVANKUDACHI, BELAGAVI.
...PETITIONER
(BY SHRI NARAYAN G.RASALKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH ITS ANTI CORRUPTION
POLICE, BELAGAVI
(R/BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
FOR THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
HIGH COURT, DHARWAD BENCH,
DHARWAD.)
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SANTOSH B.MALAGOUDAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.397
READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BELGAVI DATED 8TH FEBRUARY 2021 AND PRAYED TO
RELEASE/DEFREEZE
THE
PROPERTY
SEIZED/ACCOUNTS
SEIZED/FIXED DEPOSITS AS SHOWN IN SLNO.792, 796, 797
MENTIONED IN THE RAID PANCHANAMA DATED 16.06.2020 AS
PER ANNEXURE XV TO THE PETITIONER IN VIEW OF THE
UNDERTAKING TO PRODUCE THE REQUIRED IDEMNITY BOND
AND TO FURNISH THE SECURITY.
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN
HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDER ON 16.03.2022, COMING
ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
This revision petition is filed under Section 397 and
401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short
‘Cr.P.C.) with a prayer to set-aside the impugned order of
the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi
dated 8.2.2021 and to release/defreeze the property
seized/accounts seized/Fixed deposits held as shown in
Sl.No.792, 796, 797 mentioned in the Raid Panchanama
dated 16.6.2020, as per Annexure XV to the petition.
2.
It is contended that the petitioner is a widow
and her husband by name Surendra Uppar expired on
18.12.1992. Her son by name Subhas Surendra Uppar is
the accused in the ACB Crime No.6/2020, while he was
working as a Assistant Controller, Inspecting Squad-3,
Department of Legal Meteorology, Belagavi, a case came
to be registered for the offence punishable under Sections
13(1) (b) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 (As amended by Act No.16 of 2018).
It is contended that when the husband of the petitioner
3
was working in Government of Karnataka, in Public Works
Department, he died. The petitioner received all the
financial benefits and enjoying the same. The Government
of Karnataka sanctioned the family pension vide order
No.3925 FD dated 19.12.1992, to the petitioner. The
petitioner received family pension through Syndicate Bank
account
No.05002030002470
from
the
Treasury
Department Belagavi. This account is meant for credit of
family pension being paid every month by the Government
of Karnataka and she has not received any other income
credited to this account. So, any stretch of imagination it
could be connected to the source of income of the accused.
It is further contended that besides family pension, from
time to time, she purchases and sells the buffaloes, Desi
Cows, and H.F/Jersey Cows. During the enquiry period she
had Five Buffaloes of second/third yield and two small
buffaloes and one high milk yielding Jersey cows and daily
take these animals for grazing to the nearest green fooder
yards and lands in the neighbouring places from morning
to evening and personally milk them and sell the milk and
earn sizeable income from them. The petitioner sold the
4
same and received regular and periodical income. This
income by any stretch of imagination cannot be connected
and cannot be said to have been acquired by the accused.
She is coming from rich agricultural family and from her
father by name Ramappa Pidai, the agricultural lands are
inherited. After the death of petitioner’s father, as per the
consent of all the brothers and family elders and as last
wish of her father, the petitioner was to be given her share
i.e., receivable by father of the petitioner. Hence, the
portion of the agricultural land was sold by the brothers of
the petitioner.
3.
After the demise of their father, a suit was
instituted by sons and daughters. In O.S.No.210/2018
before Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC., Raibag, that came to
be compromised and as a result, the brothers of the
petitioner
and
their
sons
and
daughters
received
Rs.15,50,000/-, as per the cheques paid by the defendants
therein. It is further contended that as the petitioner was
not willing to take agricultural property and requested for
cash, the brothers handed over the cash under gift deed
dated 18.4.2019. Now his son is falsely implicated and
5
without obtaining the statement of petitioner, the ACB
police station filed a false source report to the ACB-
Superintendent of
Police, North
Zone,
Belagavi on
9.6.2020. The income of the petitioner with that of her
son. The ACB-Superintendent of Police, North Zone,
Belagavi during raid seized personal and individual
property of petitioner i.e., Bank passbook, post office
passbook and Vikas certificate. The bank account and cash
deposits are the own amount received from parental house
of the petitioner. As her application for release of property
was rejected. The petitioner is entitled for defreeze of
articles 789 to 795.
4.
The account at Sl.No.792 is her family pension.
The 796
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.