SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39049

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. DODDASWAMY. B. V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent


The petitioner is before this Court calling in question

registration of a crime in crime No.15/2022 for offences

punishable under Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC.

2. Heard Sri K.G.Kamath, learned counsel for the

petitioner, Smt.K.P.Yashodha, learned High Court Government

Pleader for respondent No.1 and Sri Prateek Chandramouli,

learned counsel for respondent No.2.

3. Brief facts that leads the petitioner to this Court in this

petition as borne out from the pleadings are as follows:

- 3 -

The petitioner is a Medical Transcriptionist and claims to

have possessed more than three decades of experience in the

field of medical transcription and further claims to have

registered under various authorities with regard to such

experience of the petitioner. It is averred in the petition that,

about a year ago, the petitioner had opened a diagnostic centre

offering various services of diagnostics like, X-ray, ultrasound,

ECG, blood investigation and echo cardiogram. The petitioner

has certain staff working under him who are technicians,

radiologists conducting ultrasound scans, X-rays and generating

reports at the diagnostic centre. The petitioner was earlier an

employee of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top