IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100334 OF 2019 (482-)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI.PAWANKUMAR S/O KAMALAKISHOR DARAK
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR,
R/O: MARAWADI GALLI, ILKAL,
TQ: HUNGUND, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HEMANTHKUMAR L HAVARAGI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR,
TOWN POLICE STATION, ILKAL,
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
2.
N.R. KHILARE
P.S.I. TOWN POLICE STATION,
ILKAL,TQ: HUNAGUND,
DIST: BAGALKOTE.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET AND PROCEEDINGS IN
V N
BADIGER
Digitally
signed by V
N BADIGER
Location:
DHARWAD
Date:
2022.04.06
11:24:18
+0530
- 1 -
CRL.P No. 100334 of 2019
ILKAL
TOWN
POLICE
STATION
CRIME
NO.88/2018
AND
C.C.NO.144/2019, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL
JUDGE & JMFC COURT, HUNGUND FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 285 OF
IPC, THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWIONG:
The charge sheet is filed against the petitioner alleging
that he is the doctor in Sri Maheshwari Children Hospital
belonging to him and he had drawn electrical wires in one
single pipe and due to excess load, there was fire in the
building due to electrical short circuit, hence has committed the
offence punishable under Sections 285 of IPC.
The learned Magistrate after accepting the charge
sheet took the cognizance of the aforesaid offence against the
petitioner. Taking exception to the same, this petition is filed.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the allegation made against the petitioner in the charge sheet
even accepting on the face of it does not constitute the offence
punishable under Section 285 of IPC.
- 2 -
4.
On the other hand, the learned High Court
Government Pleader appearing for the State submits that due
to negligence of the petitioner, fire broke out in the hospital,
thus endangering human life. Hence, the charge sheet filed
against the petitioner cannot be faulted with.
5.
I have considered the submissions of the learned
counsel for the parties.
6.
Section 285 of IPC specifies that any person does
any act rashly or negligently as to endanger to the human life,
or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person or
omits to take such action with any fire in his possession shall
be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a
term which may extend to six months or fine or both. To
constitute an offence punishable, a person must be in
possession of fire and acts negligently or rashly so as to
endanger human life.
7.
In the present case, the allegation is that due to
negligence of the petitioner, there was fire in the building due
to electrical short circuit which clearly implies that the
petitioner was not in possession of fire but the fire broke out
- 3 -
due to the short circuit, which does not constitute an offence
punishable under Section 285 of IPC. Hence, the charge sheet
filed against the petitioner is not sustainable in law.
Accordingly, I pass the following:
ORDER
i)
Criminal petition is allowed;
ii)
The impugned proceed in CC No.144/2019 pending
on the file of the Addl.Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Hungund is
hereby quashed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
BKM
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.