KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
DR N KRISHNAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following
reliefs:
a. Issue writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ
directing the Respondents / Bangalore Development
Authority to issue rectified sale deed, incorporating the
changes as Site No:36, Instead of existing Site No:37,
and with corresponding changes in the boundaries, in
substitution to the sale deed dated 15.02.2001 vide
Annexure – A already issued forthwith to the petitioner,
by considering the representation of the Petitioner
dated 17.12.2019 vide Annexure- B.
b. Pass any other order/s or direction as this Hon’ble
Court deems fit and proper under the facts and
circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and
equity.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the respondents and perused the
material on record.
3.
In
addition
to
reiterating
the
various
contentions urged in the petition and referring to the
documents produced by the petitioner, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that the petitioner is allottee of site
3
bearing No.37 described as the petition schedule property
carved out of Sy.No.25 of RMV II Stage Further Extension,
Bhoopasandra, Bengaluru, having been a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.