IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON9BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1193 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
George Varghese,
S/o. late V.M. George,
Aged 61 years,
Residing at No.272, Duo Marvel Layout,
Ananathapura Road, Yelahanka,
Bangalore. 560 064.
..Petitioner
(By Sri. Kiran S. Javali, Senior counsel for
Sri. Chandrashekara K., Advocate)
AND:
Superintendent of Police,
Central Bureau of Investigation,
Bellary Road,
Bangalore.
.. Respondent
(By Sri. P. Prasanna Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor)
****
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 read
with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying
to call for records in Special C.C.No.72/2007 on the file of XLVI
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI
Crl.R.P.No.1193/2012
2
Cases, Bangalore, set aside order dated 09-11-2012 and discharge
the petitioner in Special C.C.No.72/2007 on the file of XLVI
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI
cases, Bangalore and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit
and proper.
This Criminal Revision Petition having been heard through
Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing Hearing and reserved on
07-07-2022, coming on for pronouncement of orders this day, the
Court made the following:
The present petitioner, who is accused No.1 in Special
C.C.No.72/2007, pending in the Court of the XLVI Additional
City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases,
Bangalore (CCC-47), (hereinafter for brevity referred to as
"the Special Court"), for the offences punishable under Section
120B read with Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as "the
IPC") and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of
the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, (hereinafter for brevity
referred to as "the Prevention of Corruption Act") has filed this
3
revision petition, challenging the rejection of his application
filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973, (hereinafter for brevity referred to as "the Cr.P.C."), by
the Special Court, vide its order dated 09-11-2012.
2. The Police Inspector, CBI/SPE, Bangalore, filed
charge sheet against few accused persons including the
present petitioner (accused No.1) for the alleged offences
mentioned above.
3. The summary of the case of the prosecution before
the Special Court is that, the present petitioner, who is
accused No.1, was the Superintendent of Customs, EOU-IV A
Range, Department of Customs, Bangalore, from the date
05-06-2002 to the date 03-02-2003. The accused No.2 -
Sri. D.A. Ganesh was working under him as Inspector of
Customs from the date 01-01-2003. They had a duty and
responsibility to ensure the bonding of the imported raw
materials and examining the exports by 100% Export Oriented
4
Unit coming under their Range. Accused No.4 - M/s. Amisha
International represented by Accused No.3 - Sri.D.K. Jain,
was one of the 100% Export Oriented Units coming under the
EOU-IV Range. The accused No.4 - M/s. Amisha International
used to import Raw Mulberry Silk Yarn from China at Chennai
Sea Port, without paying customs duty. As per the EOU
Scheme, this Company had to export the imported Raw
Mulberry Silk Yarn by processing the same into finished
goods, i.e. Powder Grade Silk yarn to meet the export
obligations.
The accused No.4 - M/s. Amisha International had
imported five consignments of Mulberry Raw Silk Yarn from
China during the period from the date 21-11-2002 to
09-01-2003 through its Custom House Agent - M/s. Master
Stroke Freight Forwarders Private Limited, Chennai, at
Chennai Seaport. These imports were bonded at the premises
5
of accused No.4 and the Company has to export the same by
processing into Power Grade Silk Yarn.
That on the date 23-01-2003, the accused No.3 -
Sri. D.K. Jain - the Chief Executive Officer of accused No.4,
filed
a
Shipping
Bill
No.772/2003
along
with
invoice
No.A1/05/02 and packing list for export of 110 bales of
Powder Grade Silk Yarn weighing 271 kgs. valued at
`88,46,209/- kept in the container bearing No.CLHU 262095-4
of M/s. IAL Shipping Line, before accused No.1 (petitioner
herein) at his Office for inspection and sealing.
It is the allegation of the prosecution that, accused No.1,
i.e. the present petitioner, while functioning as a public
servant, in the capacity of the Superintendent of Customs,
EOU-IV Range, Department of Customs, Bangalore, during
January-2003, entered into a criminal conspiracy with accused
No.2 - the Inspector of Customs, EOU-IV Range, Bangalore,
and accused No.3 - the Chief Executive Officer of accused No.4
6
and in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy, cleared the
container No.CLHU-262095-4 containing the goods meant for
export by accused No.4, without physically verifying the same
before sealing the container, which caused wrongful loss to the
Government of India, to the tune of `26,94,251/- and
corresponding wrongful gain to themselves and thus all the
accused have committed the offences punishable under
Sections 120B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the
IPC and Sections 13 (2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the
Prevention of Corruption Act.
4. After investigation, charge sheet came to be filed
before the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.