HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH
A R SURESHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
This criminal revision petition is filed under Section 397
read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order
dated 15.12.2021 passed in S.C.No.2/2012 on the file of the II
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkamagaluru.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitionerd and the
learned High Court Government Pleader for the State.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would
submit that in the case on hand, charges are framed for the
offences punishable under Sections 302, 120-B, 404 and 201
read with Section 34 of IPC. The matter pertains to the year
2012 and the incident has taken place in 2011. The prosecution
has examined some of the witnesses and P.W.34 was not cross-
examined. Hence, an application was filed for cross-examination
of P.W.34 and also for recalling the witnesses P.Ws.10, 15, 16,
27, 28, 32, 35, 37 and 40. The Trial Court, while rejecting the
application in respect of P.Ws.10, 15, 16, 27, 28, 32, 35, 37 and
3
40 has given the reason that these witnesses have been
extensively cross-examined by the defence side and there is no
need for recalling the said witnesses. However, allowed the
application in respect of P.W.34. Hence, the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.