SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 51417

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
J SHIVAPRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


The petitioners, working as Community Affairs

Officer and Office Manager in City Municipal Council,

Robertsonpet and Chintamani respectively are before this

Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying

to quash the Government Order bearing No.NaAE 35 DMK

2017 Bengaluru dated 04.03.2022 (Annexure 3 P)

entrusting enquiry under Rule 14-A of the Karnataka Civil

Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957 (for

short 8the KCS Rules9) as well as articles of charge

bearing

No.UPALOK-2/D.E/149/2022/A.R.E-9

dated

3

12.07.2022 (Annexure Q) and to grant consequential

benefits.

Heard Ms. M.L.Suvarna, learned counsel appearing

on behalf of Sri K.Puttegowda, learned counsel for the

petitioners, Sri T.P.Srinivas, learned Principal Government

Advocate for the 1st respondent and Sri Venkatesh S.

Arabatti, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. Perused

the writ petition papers.

3.

Ms. M.L.Suvarna, learned counsel for the petitioners

would submit that petitioners at the relevant point of time

worked as Community Affairs Officer and First Division

Assistant in City Municipal Council, Kolar. On the complaint

(Annexure

3

A)

dated

28.08.2012

by

one

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top