2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32569
B RAMA SUBBA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 101250/2022
- 1 -
CRL.P No. 101250 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101250 OF 2022 (482-)
BETWEEN:
1.
B RAMA SUBBA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
OCC. DIRECTOR,
VNC COLLEGE, SWATI NILAYA
BASAVERWARA EXTENSION, HOSPETE
2.
GIRISH K.M NANDIYAL
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. DGM
NO. 451/1600, DIVYA NILAYA
6TH CROSS,
BASAVERWARA EXTENSION, HOSPETE
3.
SALIGRAM PRASAD
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. MANAGER,
P-22, CITY CENTRE,
BOKORO STEEL CITY,
JHARKHAND-827004
4.
G. VEERAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
OCC. MINING ENGINEER INCHARGE,
POST. SUNNAPURAL PALLI,
P O KHOTH PALLI, DIST. KADAPA
STATE. ANDHRA PRADESH
5.
RAVIKUMAR KARNAM
ABED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
V N
BADIGER
Digitally
signed by V
N BADIGER
Location:
DHARWAD
Date:
2022.04.21
10:56:23
+0530
- 2 -
CRL.P No. 101250 of 2022
OCC. ASSISTANT MANAGER,
R/O. K. RAM MURTHI 30335
SUNMUI STREET, PRODTHUR,
DIST. KADAPA
STATE. ANDHARA PRADESH
6.
M. OBALA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
OCC ASSISTANT MANAGER,
R/O POST. AMAKA PALLI,
PO KHOTH PALLI,
TQ. PULIVENDLA, DIST. KADAPA
STATE ANDHARA PRADESH
7.
VEERUPAKSH KAKANUR
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
OCC. MINES PORMAN,
C/O SHIVAPPA KAKANUR,
POST. KALKOND, TQ. SIGGAN,
DIST. HAVERI
8.
M V SUNDARESH
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
OCC. MINES PORMAN,
C/O. S K SOMASUNDAR ,
BACK SIDE OF RAJ MAHAL EXTENSION,
LANGANI MANDIR,
TQ AND DIST, SHIMOGGA
9.
MADIG RAMANAYYA M RANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
OCC. MINES PORMAN,
POST. ANKIREDDYPALLI,
TQ. KOLIMIGUNDLA, DIST. KARNUL,
STATE.ANDHARA PRADESH
10. V N SURESH BABU
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
- 3 -
CRL.P No. 101250 of 2022
OCC. MINESMAIT,
SAROJA S BALLARY ROAD,
BEHIND ITI COLLEGE ROAD,
DHOBI STEET, HOSPETE
11. V GOPAL REDDI S/O P NARAYAN REDDI
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. MINESMAIT,
R/O HOUSE NO.4-200-425,
D R Y S NAGAR, TQ. DHONE,
DIST. KARNUL, STATE. ANDHRA PRADESH
&PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ARAVIND D KULKARNI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH RANGE FOREST OFFICER, KALLAHALLI
GASTU, HOSAPETE DIVISION, BALLARI,
REPRSENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA
DHARWAD BENCH
&RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAMESH CHIGARI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE ORDER
DATED 05.07.2017 IN C.C.NO.890/2017 ON THE FILE OF PRL.
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOSAPETE, FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC. 24(a), (d), (f), (g), (gg), (h), 80, 82,
82B, 109 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, UNDER RULE 144,
165, OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT AND UNDER SECTION
4(1), 4(IA) AND 21 OF M.M.R.D. ACT AND ALL FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE SAID ORDER.
- 4 -
CRL.P No. 101250 of 2022
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned High Court Government Pleader accepts
notice for the respondent.
2.
A charge sheet is filed by the Range Forest
Officer
alleging
that
the
petitioners-accused
after
encroaching the forest land, destroyed the trees and are
carrying on the mining activities illegally. The learned
Magistrate by order dated 27.09.2017, took cognizance of
the offences punishable under Sections 24(a), (d), (f), (g),
(gg), (h), 73(d), 80, 82, 83B, 109 of the Karnataka Forest
Act, 1963, and Sections 4, 4(1), 4(1A), 21 of the Mines
and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for
short, 8the MMDR Act9), and issued summons to the
petitioners-accused.
3.
The
learned
counsel
appearing
for
the
petitioners submits that the alleged offence has taken
place on 19.11.2012, but cognizance of the offences
- 5 -
CRL.P No. 101250 of 2022
alleged against the petitioners is taken by the learned
Magistrate on 27.09.2017 after the expiry of the time
specified under Section 468 of Cr.P.C. He further submits
that taking cognizance of the offences alleged to have
been committed under the provi