SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 56228

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2022

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

WRIT PETITION NO.18741 OF 1996 (GM-RES) PIL

BETWEEN:

KARNATAKA STATE LEGAL

SERVICES AUTHORITY

PALACE ROAD

BANGALORE – 560 001

REPRESENTED BY ITS

SECRETARY

... PETITIONER

(SUO MOTU PETITION

AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 26.08.2002

BY SRI M.N.UMASHANKAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

VIDHANA SOUDHA

BANGALORE – 560 001

REPRESENTED BY ITS

CHIEF SECRETARY

2. CITIZEN’S ACTION GROUP

JAWAN’S QUARTERS

BDA PARK, DOUBLE ROAD

- 2 -

INDIRANAGAR, I STAGE

BANGALORE

REPRESENTED BY ITS

SECRETARY

3. UNION OF INDIA

BY ITS SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

AND FAMILY WELFARE

NIRMAN BHAVAN

NEW DELHI

... RESPONDENTS

(SRI DHYAN CHINNAPPA, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE

GENERAL ALONG WITH

SMT.REVATHY ADINATH NARDE, SPECIAL COUNSEL

FOR RESPONDENT NO.1

SMT.LAILA OLLAPALLY, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT

NO.2 – INTERVENER – VIDE COURT ORDER DATED

15.04.2002

SRI KUMAR M.N., CGC FOR RESPONDENT NO.3 –

VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 26.08.2002)

---

THIS SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION IS INITIATED

PURSUANT TO THE ORDER DATED 05.09.1995 PASSED

BY THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF

SHEELA BARSE VS. UNION BANK OF INDIA AND

OTHERS REPORTED IN (1995) 5 SCC 654 AND ETC.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY,

CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:

- 3 -

Mr.Naveen Raj Singh, Principal Secretary, Health

and Family Welfare (Medical Education), Government

of Karnataka, is present before the Court.

2.

This suo motu Public Interest Litigation has been

registered pursuant to the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s

direction

dated

05.09.1995.

The

order

dated

05.09.1995, on reproduction, reads as under:

“A letter from Ms. Sheela Barse addressed

to the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India with respect

to the deplorable conditions in which mentally ill

and insane women were locked up and kept in

Presidency jail, Calcutta, was registered as a

writ

petition

and

certain

orders

passed.

Subsequently, Ms.Sheela Barse withdrew from

the matter. In her place, the Supreme Court

Legal Aid Committee was substituted. Several

orders were passed by this Court from time to

time. Commissioners were also appointed to

investigate

and

report

on

the

conditions

obtaining in places where women and children

were being detained. Over the years, this Court

has also been monitoring the implementation of

its orders.

When this matter was placed before us on

August 21, 1995, it was suggested by Sri S.

Muralidhar, learned counsel for the petitioner

(Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee) and also

by some of the learned counsel appearing for

the respondents that it would be appropriate if

the function of monitoring the implementation of

the several orders passed by this Court is made

over to respective High Courts. It was suggested

- 4 -

that each High Court be requested to monitor

and ensure proper and full implementation of

the orders of this Court insofar as that particular

State is concerned. We found the suggestion

acceptable. Sri Muralidhar, learned counsel for

the petitioner and Sri Harish Salve, learned

counsel for the respondents have placed before

us their suggestions. The following orders are

made after hearing the learned counsel:

1. The office shall prepare requisite number of

sets of the record of this case. The record shall

be in two parts. Part-I shall contain the letter

written by Ms. Sheela Barse (along with the

enclosures thereto), the orders passed by this

Court from time to time arranged in proper

sequence and the reports of the Commissioners

appointed by this Court, again in their proper

sequence.

2. The office shall separate the affidavits,

counter

affidavits,

rejoinders

and

further

affidavits, if any, along with their annexures with

respect to each State separately. If there are

any affidavits, reports or other documents filed

by the Union of India, the same may be included

in each of such sets. This shall be treated as

Part-II of the record. Obviously, it will be

separate for each State concerned herein.

3. The cost of preparing both Parts-I and II shall

be borne by the Union of India. After the record

is prepared as directed above, the cost thereof

shall be intimated to the learned counsel for the

Union

of

India

in

this

case

who

shall

communicate

the

same

to

the

concerned

authority. The payment shall be made into the

office

of

this

Court

within

three

months

therefrom.

4. The office shall communicate a copy of Part-I

to each of the High Courts. Along with Part-I,

Part-II relating to that particular State shall also

be enclosed.

- 5 -

5. The High Courts are requested to register the

record so received by them as a Public Interest

Litigation. The Hon'ble Chief Justice of each of

the High Courts is requested to designate a

Judge of that Court to deal with the matter. The

High Court shall make all such necessary and

appropriate orders as may be warranted, from

time to time, for a proper implementation of the

orders of this Court. The High Court shall also be

free to pass such other and further orders as

may be found necessary or appropriate to

protect and improve the conditions obtaining in

places where women and children - not accused

or convicted of any crime - are detained.

6. The High Court Legal Aid Committee of each

of the High Courts shall be treated as the

petitioner in the matter in that High Court.

Copies

of

Pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top