HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANNAPPA TOPAJI KALAL – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILABAI W/O RAJANNA PAWADSHETTI – Respondent
The
captioned
second
appeal
is
filed
by
unsuccessful
plaintiff
who
is
challenging
the
concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts
below who have refused to grant discretionary relief of
specific performance of contract and have ordered for
refund with interest at the rate of 18%.
Facts leading to the above stated case are
as follows:
The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific
performance
of
contract
by
contending
that
respondent No.1/defendant No.1 offered to sell the
suit property in his favour and accordingly entered
into an agreement by executing an agreement to sell
on 05.06.1996 for a sale consideration of Rs.20,000/-.
The appellant/plaintiff has further contended that
pursuant to the said agreement to sell, he paid an
earnest money of Rs.15,000/- and that he was ever
ready and willing to perform his part of contract. It
4
was also contended that respondent No.1/defendant
No.1 delivered possession as per the recitals in the
agreement
to
sell.
The
present
suit
in
O.S.No.332/1999 was filed on 16.10.1999 after
issuing legal notice when appellant/plaintiff found that
the 1st defendant has sold the suit schedule property
under a registered sale deed dated 26.04.1999.
Resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.