SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANNAPPA TOPAJI KALAL – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILABAI W/O RAJANNA PAWADSHETTI – Respondent


The

captioned

second

appeal

is

filed

by

unsuccessful

plaintiff

who

is

challenging

the

concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts

below who have refused to grant discretionary relief of

specific performance of contract and have ordered for

refund with interest at the rate of 18%.

Facts leading to the above stated case are

as follows:

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific

performance

of

contract

by

contending

that

respondent No.1/defendant No.1 offered to sell the

suit property in his favour and accordingly entered

into an agreement by executing an agreement to sell

on 05.06.1996 for a sale consideration of Rs.20,000/-.

The appellant/plaintiff has further contended that

pursuant to the said agreement to sell, he paid an

earnest money of Rs.15,000/- and that he was ever

ready and willing to perform his part of contract. It

4

was also contended that respondent No.1/defendant

No.1 delivered possession as per the recitals in the

agreement

to

sell.

The

present

suit

in

O.S.No.332/1999 was filed on 16.10.1999 after

issuing legal notice when appellant/plaintiff found that

the 1st defendant has sold the suit schedule property

under a registered sale deed dated 26.04.1999.

Resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top