SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KARIYAPPAKUMMUR S/O. MALLAPPAKUMMUR – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


The

petitioner,

who

contends

that

he

has

purchased plot No.3 in the residential layout developed

by the third respondent in Sy.No.180A of Haveri, Taluk

and District Haveri, has impugned Annexure – F, the

3

final approval issued by the third respondent for

development of the aforesaid layout.

The petitioner contends that the third

respondent has transferred the aforesaid Plot No.3 in

the said residential layout in his favour under the sale

deed dated 03.04.2006 and his property, as described

under the aforesaid sale deed, is bounded on the

western side by a park and on the eastern and southern

sides by roads. The third respondent has executed the

sale deed in terms of the initial sanction granted for

development by the first respondent in the year 2006,

and after the plots are so developed and transferred,

including the subject plot, the first respondent has

issued

final

approval

modifying

the

plan.

Consequentially, the petitioner’s property, which should

abut roads on its two sides and a park, is affected with

the park and the road being relocated as per the

modified final approval.

4

The first respondent, to meet the grounds

canvassed on behalf of the petitioner, has filed an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top