SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHAKUNTHALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
DODDARAMAIAH – Respondent


Challenging judgment and decree dated 02.08.2018

passed in R.A.No.15037/2017 by V Additional District &

Sessions

Judge,

Devanahalli,

Bengaluru

Rural

District,

Bengaluru, by allowing appeal reversing judgment and decree

dated 12.06.2017 passed in O.S.No.1012/2007 by Senior Civil

Judge

&

JMFC.,

Devanahalli,

Bengaluru

Rural

District,

Bengaluru, appellant has preferred this second appeal.

2. Appellant herein was plaintiff in suit and respondent in

first appeal. Whereas, respondents no.1 and 2 herein were

defendants no.1 and 2 in suit and appellants no.1 and 2 in first

appeal. For sake of convenience, parties shall hereinafter be

referred to as per their rank in trial court.

3. Plaintiff filed O.S.No.1012/2007 against defendants for

relief of partition and separate possession. It was stated in

plaint that defendant no.3 was her brother, while defendant

no.1 was her father and defendant no.2, her uncle. It is stated

that they constituted Hindu undivided joint family governed by

- 3 -

Hindu Mithakshara School of Law. It was her case that land

bearing Sy.No.145/1 measuring 02 acres 18 guntas situated at

Budigere village, Channarayapatna Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk

(hereinafter referred t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top