SURAJ GOVINDARAJ,G BASAVARAJA
SHIVAGANGAVVA W/O KALLANAGOUDA BISANALLI – Appellant
Versus
MAHADEVAPPA FAKKIRAPPA SHIGLI – Respondent
The
appellants
who
are
the
plaintiffs
in
O.S.N.o.107/2010 are before this Court aggrieved by
the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2017 passed
by the Addl.Senior Civil Judge, Gadag sitting at
Lakshmeshwar (hereafter referred to as 8the trial
Court9, for short).
O.S.No.107/2010 had been filed for partition, the
plaintiffs claiming 1/3rd share in the suit schedule
properties. The said suit came to be dismissed by
the trial Court with costs.
The parties are referred to by their ranking before
the trial Court for easy reference.
The case of the plaintiffs is that;
4.1. One Veerabhadrappa was the propositus who
had three children namely, Fakirappa, Mallappa
- 4 -
and Gundappa. Mallappa had a daughter by
name Neelavva of whom the plaintiffs are the
daughters.
4.2. Fakirappa expired leaving behind his sons
defendants No.1, 2 and 3. Gundappa expired
leaving behind his son defendant No.4.
4.3. It is contended that the suit schedule properties
were under the ownership of Veerabhadrappa
and subsequent to his death the said properties
came to be enjoyed by Fakirappa, Mallappa and
Gundappa as joint owners. Fakirappa having
expired
on
27.07.1955,
Mallappa
having
expired on 02.01.1977 and G
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.