SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 50725

SMT NANJAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE BY BEECHANAHALLI POLICE – Respondent


This appeal is preferred by the accused feeling

aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 28.11.2011

passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Mysore, in Spl. Case No.27/2009, wherein, she has been

convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable

under Section 138(1)(a) of the Electricity Act 2003,

Section 429 of IPC and Section 9 read with Section 51 of

the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

2.

Heard both side and perused the material on

record.

3.

The case of the prosecution is that the

accused is the owner of land bearing Sy.No.52/113 of

Beeramballi

village,

Antharasanthe

Hobli,

H.D.Kote

Taluk. She has grown sugarcane in the said land and

3

fenced the land with alluminum wire and has given

electric connection to the said fencing by drawing

electricity unauthorizedly from the power station situated

in the land. On 29.10.2008, a female elephant came in

contact with the electric fence which was erected around

the land of the accused and died due to electrocution.

4.

Charges were framed against the accused for

offences punishable under Section 135 of the Electricity

Act, 2003, Section 429 of IPC and Section 9 read with 51

of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

5.

I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top