B P MARAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
This appeal is preferred by the accused feeling
aggrieved by the Judgment and order of conviction and
sentence passed by the I Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No.101/2008, wherein, he
has been convicted and sentenced for the offences
punishable under Section 138(1)(a) of the Electricity Act,
2003, Section 429 of IPC and Section 9 read with Section
51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.
2.
Heard both sides and perused the material on
record.
3.
It is the case of prosecution that the accused
has unauthorizedly drawn electricity connection to the
fence
put
up
by
him
around
his
land
bearing
3
Sy.No.91/6 P-2 of Naganapura village, Hullalli Hobli,
Nanjangud Taluk. On 24.11.2007, a female elephant
came in contact with the said fencing and died due to
electric shock.
4.
Charges were framed against the accused for
offences punishable under Section 9 r/w Section 51 of
the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Section 429 IPC and
Sections 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003.
5.
In order to bring home the guilt of the
accused, the prosecution got examined 15 witnesses and
got marked 18 documents.
6.
The Trial Court has come to the conclusion
that the accus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.