SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 53754

SRI. J.R. NARAYANASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


The petitioner, who asserts ownership of 4 acres 9

guntas in Sy.No.1168 in Belagola village, Belagola Hobli,

Srirangapatna

Taluk,

Mandya

District

-

subject

property, has impugned the Notifications under Section

3

28(1) and 28(4) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas

Development Act, 1966 (for short 8the KIAD Act9). The

impugned preliminary and final notifications under the

corresponding provisions of Section 28(1) and 28(4) of

the KIAD Act are respectively dated 13.10.2006 and

03.10.2007.

2.

The undisputed facts are that the Karnataka

Industrial Areas Development Board (for short 8the

KIADB9) has simultaneously issued Notifications under

Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act notifying the subject

property and other lands measuring 1495 acres 15

guntas for the purpose of establishment of industrial

area. The petitioner has not filed objections to the first

notice. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB has

passed orders on 01.03.2007 under Section 28(3) of the

KIAD Act. The State Government has issued the

impugned Notification under Section 28(4) of the KIAD

Act on 03.10.2007.

4

3.

Smt B. V. Vidyulatha, the learned Counsel

for the petitioner, relying upon these circumstances

submits

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top